[Physics] "Real" time

[Doug Marett]

Thanks Ruud!

    What is so interesting to me about it is that the research suggests
that magnetic induction can occur without even the counter-movement of a
magnet and a conductor, or even a changing magnetic field. Rather, all that
is necessary is the rotation of a magnet/conductor together with respect to
"the fixed stars". Again, it brings us back to the idea that an "absolute
frame of reference" has a physical meaning.

Doug

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Ruud Loeffen <rmmloeffen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Doug.
>
> Congratulations to you. I hope you will gain recognition for your work.
> It's pretty difficult for me to understand, but it seems to me accurate and
> convincing. Good luck! Thumps up!👍
>
> Ruud Loeffen
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Doug Marett <dm88dm at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>>     Just wanted to share with you my latest research testing one of
>> Einstein's ideas. This is the explanation of the Faraday Paradox / unipolar
>> dynamo.
>>  The just released Youtube video is here:
>>
>> https://youtu.be/c5wgmTGi5pU
>>
>> Seems that the evidence is in and there are some very strange things
>> happening with magnetic induction! Check it out!
>>
>> The part 1 of the video is here, for context:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gduYoT9sMaE
>>
>> Doug
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Ilja Schmelzer <
>> ilja.schmelzer at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> 2016-10-30 19:30 GMT+01:00, Thomas Goodey <thomas at flyingkettle.com>:
>>> > The above statements are not expressed in space-time terms.
>>>
>>> Indeed.  But this does not make them wrong.  I do not doubt that they
>>> can be translated into spacetime language, but see no advantage from
>>> this.  In fact, they become weaker in this way.
>>>
>>> >> Another important
>>> >> class is related with causality:  If event A has causally
>>> >> influenced event B, then when A has happened before B has
>>> >> happened.
>>>
>>> > This statement is also subject to the same clarification as
>>> > I have given above.
>>>
>>> With statements about causality the weakening becomes even more
>>> obvious.  As far as a translation of causal statements into spacetime
>>> language is possible at all, it has to be formulated in a language,
>>> which does not lead into contradictions if applied to solutions with
>>> causal loops, like the Goedel universe.
>>>
>>> So I doubt that "clarification" is the appropriate word here.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Physics mailing list
>>> Physics at tuks.nl
>>> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Physics mailing list
>> Physics at tuks.nl
>> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Ruud Loeffen*
> Paardestraat32
> 6131HC Sittard
> http://www.human-DNA.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Physics mailing list
> Physics at tuks.nl
> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20161101/2e69104d/attachment.html>