[Physics] The filter of logic & forum suggestion

[Zoltan Losonc]

Maurice’s idea to use the tool of logic for the evaluation of the proposed theories and papers is fairly sound. Its proper usage supposed to be obligatory in official science as well. But hey, we don’t live in a perfect world… There are only two “small” problems to solve first. 

One problem is that it is unrealistic to expect that we (or anyone for that matter) would be able to write a program in a reasonable timeframe that could do it automatically. To accomplish such a task one would have to employ many programmers, which would require very deep pockets to fund the project. It supposed to use some kind of artificial intelligence, and it would take quite some time before it would become usable. Therefore we will have to perform the logical analysis ourselves, or more specifically those who have got sufficient interest in a certain paper, free time, and willingness to do it. Which basically boils down to writing a critique and posting it.

The second problem is that even though we might think, that the rules of logic are as strict as the rules of mathematics, there are very few people who actually use strict logic in their papers. In most cases the new theory bleeds away right at the very start, by building it on false assumptions and engrained pseudoscientific dogmas that are deemed to be the unshakable foundations of nature. Thus even if we manually implement the test of logic via writing a critique, there will be surely opposing opinions about what is logical, what is not; and then not to speak about what can be reasonably assumed to be an unshakable law of nature, and what can not. Therefore to expect a smooth ride while trying to establish a consensus among “dissident scientists” coming from so many different branches of science, is unrealistic. Be prepared for wild differences of opinion!

There is one more tiny problem with the consensus, when it comes to important discoveries. I hope that most of the subscribers are aware that there are very deep pockets interested in suppressing some of the knowledge that we are trying to discover and publish. They consider us to be their enemies and wage a war against us (quite successfully so far). The most important part of this war for them is intelligence gathering. Therefore they have their own undercover agents planted into every community, forum, and mailing list they can reach. It is unrealistic to expect that they have missed the de Climont's list from where our email addresses were collected. Therefore I am sure that there are (or there will be) planted disinfo agents amongst us, who will not only collect information, but will also create chaos, conflicts, and spread disinformation to derail attention from important topics and real science. Watch out for such elements, and don’t let yourselves get drawn into traps. I have seen this manifest countless times on public free-energy forums.

I would suggest to Arend, to convert this email list into a forum. Arend, since you have got your own server, this should not be a problem for you, because there are very good forum software out there for free. If you need recommendation, I can give you some tips; and also about features that would be very useful. The main reason why a forum would be preferable is that we are coming from diverse fields of science and not everybody is interested in everything. In a forum one can very easily choose which topics he is interested in, and the discussion and organization of the information would be also much easier. The forum does not necessarily have to be public, and posting should be enabled only for the list members. Our email boxes would also stay much cleaner.

Zoltan Losonc