[Physics] your Theory of Everything

[Hans van Leunen]

Please remove me from these mailing lists. It is exploding and takes too much time for me and offers no real benefits. I can spend my time in a better way than reading and answering a fast growing number of messages that offer no interesting content.
----Origineel Bericht----
Van : lamare at gmail.com
Datum : 19/10/2016 20:36
Aan : leeshimmin at gmail.com, physics at tuks.nl
Onderwerp : Re: [Physics] your Theory of Everything
 
  
   
    
     Hello Lee,
     
     
    Thanks for the reference to Lorentz. I was unaware he had a theory of gravity. Could be interesting to check out.
    
    
   I've cc-ed the physics list. Some discussion might come forth there.
   
   
  Regards,
  
  
 Arend.
 
 
  
  
   
    
     
      
       
        
       Arend Lammertink, MScEE,
       
      Goor, The Netherlands.
      
      
     Please note that I'm currently overwhelmed with e-mails. If you're interested in discussing science and/or physics, please consider subscribing to the mailing list I created for that purpose:
     
     
     http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
     
     
      
       
        
       
      
     
    
   
  
  
  
   On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:40 AM, William Shimmin 
   <leeshimmin at gmail.com> wrote:
   
   
    
     Dear Arend,
     
      
     
     
      I’m pretty much out of the loop these days, and I’m not enthusiastic about joining the lists.  I read your article with great interest.  I’m afraid it has not budged me from my present stance regarding electromagnetism.  Perhaps I’m just too stubborn.  You and I are in agreement that Maxwell’s Equations are a mess.  I’ll give you a starter opinion: not unreasonably, Maxwell made a “theory” based on the 
      net fields.  Unfortunately in my opinion, ignoring the underlying electric fields will invariably give a sadly incomplete theory of electromagnetism.
     
     
      
     
     
      My hero is Hendrik Antoon Lorentz.  He could see that the individual underlying fields had relevance.  Please study his 1900 paper called (in English) Considerations on Gravity.  Incidentally, I happen to believe that he lays out the correct theory of gravity in that paper.  In retrospect it seems obvious.  I would really like to hear your response to that paper.  I presume you will read it in the original Dutch.
     
     
      
     
     
      Yours in the search,        Lee Shimmin
     
    
   
  
  
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20161019/5cea3982/attachment.html>