[Physics] Clock time vs. common sense time

[Doug Marett]

Hi Ruud,

    Yes, I ended up having to publish on Vixra, since Arxiv.org wouldn't
publish my straight forward paper. Apparently, submissions to Vixra are now
way up, because publishing on Arxix.org is becoming so difficult for
independents. I actually was thinking that if you try to publish on
Arxiv.org without an academic affiliation ( and without a previous history
there), that you may get blocked automatically.

Doug

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 4:30 AM, Ruud Loeffen <rmmloeffen at gmail.com> wrote:

> To Ilja and Doug and others.
>
> Yes: it's clear that "classical" scientist don't want new or innovative
> ideas to supersede the mainstream sciences. Some scientists like Halton Arp
> were refused to use the observational tools: “ As Dr. Arp’s colleagues
> lost patience
> <http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/07/science/space/halton-c-arp-astronomer-who-challenged-big-bang-theory-dies-at-86.html?_r=1> *with
> his quest, he was no longer invited to speak at major conferences, and his
> observing time on the mighty 200-inch telescope began to dry up. Warned in
> the early 1980s that his research program was unproductive, he refused to
> change course. Finally, he refused to submit a proposal at all on the
> grounds that everyone knew what he was doing. **He got no time at all.” *
> Than he was engaged in the Planck institute*. *Also Julian Schwinger was
> not appreciated: *[Q] But you must have admired his elegance as a
> physicist?*
> *Murray: No. I despised it *: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmi1MhRfoWU
>
>
> Physicist seem to be quite human...
>
> I don't know if you know vixra.org (the reverse of arxiv!) They offer
> especially place to people who are refused on arxiv.org
> I read a warning on a physicsforum: "don't publish on vixra if you want to
> be taken seriously".😖
>
> So I think it's very good to exchange our ideas and perhaps we can be
> stronger together. Perhaps there are some tools available to be shared (no
> accelerator....)
>
> Best regards.
> Ruud Loeffen.
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Ilja Schmelzer <
> ilja.schmelzer at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> I personally see no chance for experiments.  Simply because in the
>> particle physics domain you can do nothing without particle
>> accelerators, and in gravity nothing without the big observational
>> tools used in modern astronomy. The time of experiments done at home
>> is over.  One or another accidental thing may happen, like cold fusion
>> or so.  But I doubt experiments from outsiders can give more.
>>
>> I have encountered problems with arxiv.org too.
>>
>> First they have tried to reject a paper which was a combination of an
>> old one with some new results.  Too close to each other, so this can
>> be only one arxiv paper - despite completely different publications,
>> where the second one was made in full awareness of the publisher that
>> some old content will be reused.
>>
>> Then they have simply rejected an ether paper which was an answer to a
>> paper itself published there. The arguments for rejection have been
>> completely off,  I was able to reject them, but only to avoid worse
>> things (like being allowed to publish there only already published
>> papers) but the paper itself was nonetheless not published.
>>
>> So, arxiv.org is increasingly going insane in their censorship.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Physics mailing list
>> Physics at tuks.nl
>> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Ruud Loeffen*
> Paardestraat32
> 6131HC Sittard
> http://www.human-DNA.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Physics mailing list
> Physics at tuks.nl
> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20161029/5f06bcc3/attachment.html>