[Physics] Physics Digest, Gravitational Waves

[Tufail Abbas]

Dear Randy,

Your paper is really interesting!!

I can see that your paper has lot of hidden equations.

Could you please share the version of paper with those equations included.

Thanks,

Tufail Abbas

On 6 Oct 2017 7:37 pm, "Randy O. Wayne" <row1 at cornell.edu> wrote:

Dear Carl Johnson,

I think that even if the wavelength of gravitational waves were 3 x 10^6 m
and they traveled at 3 x 10^8 m/s, it would only take 0.01 s to pass
through a detector. For other reasons I favor La Sage gravitation over
general relativity. I am attaching a paper of mine that is in press.

Thank,

Randy







*From:* Physics [mailto:physics-bounces at tuks.nl] *On Behalf Of *
cj at mb-soft.com
*Sent:* Friday, October 6, 2017 10:57 AM
*To:* physics at tuks.nl
*Subject:* Re: [Physics] Physics Digest, Gravitational Waves



Some of you guys in this group might have an ideal opportunity to become
known.



Recently, the Nobel Prrize Committees showed how "political" their
decisions are and where actual science is not that important to them.  They
gave some Nobel Prizes in Physics regarding Gravitational Waves that have
allegedly been detected.



Please look into the following.  The Newtonian Gravitational formula is
essentially identical to the Coulomb's Law formula.  Gravitational mass
instead of electrical charge and the value of the Constant arre the only
differences.  Everyone knows the similarity of Electromagnetism and
Gravitation, where gravitation is so relatively weak by a factor of
trillions.



About fifteen years ago, I did the math regarding both of them.  You guys
can do it as well, and I am sure you will be as surprised as I was at the
math results.



It is easy to calculate that for electromagnetism, we can see an "entire
wave" of microwaves in a fraction of a billionth of a second.  Simple
Physics.



Fifteen years ago, I did that same simple math for gravitation, and I found
that "one wave length" clearly takes many thousands of years to complete.
Yes, gravitational waves certainly DO exist, but they are SO large that in
anyone's life, no one can witness even a tiny fraction of "one
wavelength".  Specifically, if a gravitational wave was passing through our
region right now, a single wave is currently in the Orion Belt stars and
here at the same time.  Yes, that gravitational wave must carry incredible
Energy in it, but to try to DETECT such a wave is clearly essentially
impossible.



A wavelength of thousands of light years, and a frequency of a single wae
per thousands of years.



Those Researchers never bothered to mention such frequency or wavelength.
The Nobel Committee never had a clue of this enormous difficulty regarding
any experiment to try to detect any sinusoidal wave that is so huge and
slow.  If anyone would (or will) ever notice this wavelength and frequency
issue, they would see how impossible it is for us humans to detect such
things (even though I certainly agree that they exist.)



If ANY ONE would do the Math and inform the Nobel Committee about this
issue, they would see the "emptiness" of such a specific Nobel Prize.  Why
don't one of you do that?



I certainly respect the work of many of my fellow Physicists.  But hadn't
Nobel considered awarding a Prize to those two "physicists" who had claimed
to produce "cold fusion" some time back.  It was only after actual
Physicists examined those clasims that it became obvious that the claim was
foolish.  Unfortunately, this is probably again the situation regarding
detecting Gravitational Waves.



Carl Johnson



_______________________________________________
Physics mailing list
Physics at tuks.nl
http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20171006/cf61e282/attachment.html>