[Physics] Situation of the calculation of alpha (the fine structure constant)

[Ruud Loeffen]

Hello Jesus.

I presume you know this website: https://www.mathsisfun.com/quadratic-
equation-solver.html
I chequed your results with this formula:
[image: Inline image 3]
The results was: 0,007297329116461530 nearly the same as yours:
0,007297329116461400
I used for a, b and c:
a= 1,0000000000
b=  34,251812546584300
c= -0,2500000000 [image: Inline image 1]


What do you expect to discover with your efforts? Do you think the formula
is pointing at "something"? I read your information about the "Physical
approach" the light-tower and the seagull.

Good luck on your quest.

Ruud Loeffen.



On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:11 AM, <jesus.sanchez.bilbao at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
>
>
> Just to inform of the last update regarding the issue. I have just added
> the following equation for alpha as an example in researchgate:
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> you can find in the file attached, the example of an equation for alpha
> (quadratic) with 0.00032% error. As commented, the exact solution would be
> expected in a quartic equation.
>
> The root of the equation is: x=0.0072973291164614
>
> while the value of alpha is: α=0.0072973525664
>
> Error: 0.00032%
>
> You can see the equation in the image attached. Anyhow I write it just in
> case:
>
> x^2+(2*sqrt(3)*π^2+1/16)x-1/4=0
>
>
>
> https://www.researchgate.net/project/Calculation-of-the-
> fine-structure-constant
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Enviado desde Correo <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>
> para Windows 10
>
>
>
> *De: *Jesus Sanchez <jesus.sanchez.bilbao at gmail.com>
> *Enviado: *domingo, 28 de enero de 2018 21:03
> *Para: *Physics Group <physics at tuks.nl>
> *Asunto: *Situation of the calculation of alpha (the fine structure
> constant)
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> I have been trying during the last year to find an alternative way to
> arrive to the value of the constant alpha 0.00729 (unitless constant). I
> have updated the situation of the project in researchgate and I attach it
> to you for your information.
>
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> I will explain here all that I have tried, but regretfully with no the
> expected results. But just in case this experience can be usefull for all
> of you or the next ones to come.
>
> -First: mathematical approach. Forgetting about the meaning, I have looked
> for new numbers (apart from pi and the powers of two) inside the sine wave
> and the sphere (where the electron is moving). For example, I have found
> the length of the elementary sine wave in a cycle to be 7.640... (a number
> obtained with an integration and not related to pi). So I have tried to
> correlate with fine structure constant with no result. I have found a lot
> of new numbers if we project the sine wave in the sphere (the real length
> of the elctron trajectory). I have mixed all these new numbers among them,
> with pi, powers of two. Whatever you can imagine with no result.
>
> -Second: Physical approach. For this what I have defined is a model where
> the proton is like a lighthouse and the electron is like a seagull with a
> rotating mirror in his head. Trying to fix that it is necessary that at
> certain points both things must face each other so the photons can be sent
> and abosrbed by the electron. Let's say like a discretization of
> interactions (not alll possible, only the ones that fulfill certain
> timing/synchronization). Also, taking into account that as the electron is
> moving, the mirror rotates slower than the proton because of relativistic
> issues (even if we consider that originally rotated at the same speed), so
> the synchro has to be got via distances or angles. This would lead to
> constraints, and the fine structure constant would appear as one of them.
> Believe me I have tried. Normally I would get a promising quartic equation
> with two complex roots (disregarded in principle) a trivial value like zero
> or higher than one (higher than the speed of light) and the final root, the
> value that should be alpha=0.00729, it is normally a value betwenn 0,2 and
> 0,5 far away from alpha.
>
> Also, I have tried to considerate that these particles have spin 1/2 so an
> own turn is 4pi instead of 2pi, making variations in the result but
> continueing being far away from alpha.
>
> The nearest I have been to alpha is 1/16pi^2 (0.00633). It is logical as
> it is 1/(4pi)^2 being 4pi one own turn for an electron. And the squares are
> easy to get when there are relatvistic issues or quartic equations. And the
> rest for the fine tuning (until 0.00729) would be with the rest of the
> coefficients of whatever the equation it is.
>
> Sorry to give bad news but this is the situation, I will keep trying if I
> have more ideas or ways to follow. But the pace would be even slower than
> until now.
>
>
>
>
>
> https://www.researchgate.net/project/Calculation-of-the-
> fine-structure-constant
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Physics mailing list
> Physics at tuks.nl
> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
>
>


-- 
*Ruud Loeffen*
Paardestraat32
6131HC Sittard
http://www.human-DNA.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20180130/5aaae3c5/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3301 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20180130/5aaae3c5/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5438 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20180130/5aaae3c5/attachment-0001.png>