[Physics] About the Einstein Coupling Constant kappa in EFE

[Ruud Loeffen]

Hello members of Physics-list.

Perhaps you have 8 minutes to view my You Tube video "Einstein Field
equation Uncovered. <http://bit.ly/2Lcw6Fh>"
If you read my earlier messages about it: you know the content already.  If
you like the video, please like it👍

Best regards.

Ruud Loeffen
=================================
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Ruud Loeffen <rmmloeffen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear members of Physicslist.
>
> The information about EFE (Einstein Field equation) that I could find
> until now indicates that this equation impacts a lot of tensors and are
> indeed very difficult to calculate
> In Einstein Field Equations ( http://www.spacetime-model.com/files/efe.pdf
> ) We read:
> “This constant κ is called “Einstein Constant” or “Constant of
> Proportionality”. To calculate it, the Einstein Equation (134) must be
> identified to the Poisson’s classical field equation, which is the
> mathematical form of the Newton Law.” This paper is extremely difficult for
> me. If you follow the traces of the EFE in Wiki, you find connections with
> Jacobi field, with co-variant derivatives with respect to the Levi-Civita
> connection, Newton-Euler equations, and the Riemann curvature tensor. In
> Riemannian geometry, a Jacobi field is a vector field along a geodesic in a
> Riemannian manifold describing the difference between the geodesic and an
> "infinitesimally close" geodesic. In other words, the Jacobi fields along a
> geodesic form the tangent space to the geodesic in the space of all
> geodesics. As Carl Johnson pointed out: Riemannian equations are extremely
> difficult to resolve. I found many of these calculations in extremely
> difficult to read papers. I never found some concrete calculations about
> the velocity of planets and other kinds of data that are interesting to
> know about. Until now I could not find any concrete calculation about this
> EFE: for example, a star with orbiting planets. I read about all these
> tensors and equations and I believe that they are all true.
>
> *However: My point of view is, that all these tensors together are
> summarized and compressed in a clear equation with just 3 parameters and
> can be explained in an easy to understand and plausible meaning.*
> .
> In this file "Around kappa"
> <https://drive.google.com/open?id=1UdlyNGgeNhsQejHNRSmfrc_qdL7__uG9> you
> find my explanation in detail. So far, I could not find a similar
> explanation anywhere.
> Still I am very convinced that it is true. May be: any one knows this. But
> I don't think that any one knows. I came to this insight by using the (y-1)
> function and the VRMS value and then go back to the Gravitational Constant
> of Newton. Otherwise I would not have invented this explanation. This paper
> might be time consuming. If you don't want to spend too much time you could
> start with my answer on a Quora question about EFE. Please see:
> https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-intuition-behind-
> the-Einsteins-field-equations/answer/Ruud-Loeffen
>
> I hope to receive some comments:
> * Is my explanation an open door: every body who studied the EFE and the
> Einstein Coupling Constant knew this already?
> * If not well known: do you agree on my reasoning?
>
> This topic is discussed already by Tufail Abbas and me. We try to find a
> connection with Quantum Mechanics and the Electrical Constant (Coulomb
> Constant)..
>
> Best regards.
>
> Ruud Loeffen.
>



-- 
*Ruud Loeffen*
http://www.human-DNA.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20180715/30ccdcc0/attachment.html>