[Physics] Compatibility with and/or the properties of the Standard Model (SM)

[Tom Hollings]

 Mike, I like this : - "If you do not start with what actually exists in nature, you 
cannot expect any mathematical model to generate the right results. 
Mathematics alone, built on logic, without a physical foundation to 
build on is broken..."
Very true. My saying is : - The real world can be represented by maths, but maths does not always represent the real world.

Tom Hollings

 
> On 27 April 2020 at 12:12 mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk wrote:
> 
> 
> Arend,
> 
> You obviously have not read my paper. It shows that you only need one 
> particle/anti-particle, one composite system (loops) and two forces to 
> described everything we observe. This is the simplest possible system 
> that could ever be envisged. Its 'only' complexity lies in the need to 
> mathematically model the interactions between the 
> particles/anti-particles in one loop with those in another loop. The SM 
> is too simplistic because it does not consider fermions to be composite 
> particles. If you do not start with what actually exists in nature, you 
> cannot expect any mathematical model to generate the right results. 
> Mathematics alone, built on logic, without a physical foundation to 
> build on is broken eg 'This sentence is untrue.'.
> Cheers
> Mike