[Physics] New topic question: Entropy

[kostadinos at aol.com]

James and All,
In the link below you will find some interesting results regarding Entropy. Among these is a rephrasing of the Second Law of Thermodynamics to read "all physical processes take some positive duration of time to occur".
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271076416_Entropy_and_'The_Arrow_of_Time'_A_Love_Story_by_Constantinos_Ragazas
Enjoy!
Kostas
kostadinos at aol.com


-----Original Message-----
From: James Rose <integrity at prodigy.net>
To: General Physics and Natural Philosophy discussion list <physics at tuks.nl>
Sent: Tue, Apr 28, 2020 12:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Physics] New topic question: Entropy


 Ilja,

Intersting association.  From my readings .. "entropy" came from Clausius, Gibbs, and Boltzmann . to mathematize dynamic phenomena related to gasses, machines and the industrial revolution.
James

    On Monday, April 27, 2020, 9:26:17 PM PDT, Ilja Schmelzer <ilja.schmelzer at gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 The actual definition of entropy is not strongly associated with
thermodynamics. It is, instead, part of Bayesian probability theory.
They apply a method named "entropic inference" to a lot of very
different things.

2020-04-28 6:39 GMT+06:30, James Rose <integrity at prodigy.net>:
> Good day, all,
> Is anyone considering that current convention analysis/designations of
> 'entropy' might be incomplete and worthy of further investigation?
> I am a General Systems analyst ... dealing with such things as 'complexity',
> emergence, enaction principles that are currently -different- between
> non-living (effectively aka . "closed") systems .. and .. living
> (effectively aka . "open") systems .. and if there is a way to correlate the
> types more accurately .. where .. the possibility exists that they actually
> have a -shared- core mechanism for their behaviors and performance
> attributes~capabilities?
> (sorry for the long question .. there is a lot to corral together and
> consider simultaneously)
> I have been looking at an essential adapted definition of entropy ... a
> 'generalization' .. so to speak ... where it is not so strongly associated
> with thermodynamics.   I am not intimating such a new model has -no-
> association with thermodynamics .. only that thermodynamics of only -one-
> ... of -several- possible phenomena and dynamics .. where some other core
> qualia which is central and key to "entropy" .. can be identified and seen
> in non-thermodynamic evaluated systems.
> I would appreciate any thoughts.  I have begun the building of new equations
> that exactly identify that attribute of entropic factors and especially  ...
> defining "-interactions- between local entropic groupings".   [similar to
> Prigogine's model of 'far from equilibrium' ..but even more general than his
> equations (i.e. - not limited to chemistry)].
> Thank you everyone, for considering my question(s).   Looking forward to
> responses and opinions.....
>
> James (Jamie) Roseintegrity at prodigy.netMinden   NV  (north NV near Carson
> City)
>

_______________________________________________
Physics mailing list
Physics at tuks.nl
http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
  _______________________________________________
Physics mailing list
Physics at tuks.nl
http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20200429/d55d183c/attachment.html>