[Physics] Compatibility with and/or the properties of the Standard Model (SM)

Tom Hollings carmam at tiscali.co.uk
Wed Apr 29 11:29:48 CEST 2020


Mike, most people on this forum will not get past peer review, for the simple reason that we go against mainstream "groupthink". We do not believe most of the mainstream theories which are out there. My speciality is Einstein's SRT, followed by GRT, and although I do not know as much about GRT as I do SRT, I know enough to get by. In any case, as GRT is built on SRT, if SRT fails, so does GRT. One of the main predictions of SRT is that no material body (and no information either) can travel faster than light.
See my web page :- http://problemswithrelativity.com/#lorentz  look at the fourth paragraph if you want to skip the intro, and tell me where my error is. Proponents of GRT say that the Global Positioning System would not work without GRT & SRT, but this is plain wrong, as any in depth investigation will show. We are told also that a Sagnac correction is built into the system, but why should that be? The Sagnac correction is for signals which go round a loop and back to the starting point, this plainly does not apply to the GPS, as all signals travel only one way - from the satellites to the receivers.

Tom Hollings.



> On 28 April 2020 at 10:56 mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk wrote:
> 
> 
> Ilja,
> 
> Good of you to comment, but have you ever heard of the concept of 'Group 
> Think'. The peer review process is a pefect example of how to do group 
> think. To make progress in anything requires looking beyond what is 
> known to what could be. Once you have a framework that appears to 
> provide solutions to you questions, you then need to work from that to 
> what is observed(generally mathematically in the case of physics). This 
> can be difficult when you are working with concepts that have not been 
> explored previously, which is why words sometimes have to be used in 
> explanations because the mathematics would take too long in the specific 
> context. My comments on this site may have been in words, but please see 
> my various published papers for the maths.
> Cheers
> Mike

> _______________________________________________
> Physics mailing list
> Physics at tuks.nl
> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics



More information about the Physics mailing list