[Physics] Cubic Atomic Model + Theory

Tom Hollings carmam at tiscali.co.uk
Sat May 9 14:14:57 CEST 2020


Mike, regarding your answer to Arend. The real world can always be expressed by maths, but maths does not always express the real world. The maths may work out correctly, but have no correspondence in reality. Instead of doing the maths and then saying "this is possible, let's look for it", look for something (or find it by accident), and then do the maths to explain it. That sentence is simplified of course.
Back to my posting. Instead of answering using SRT as I asked (and GRT if you think it is needed), you started talking about photons and meons and loops chasing each other. Just answer the question, or tell me where I am wrong. As I said in my previous post, yes, friction will act on a body, but when that body carries a source of power ie a reaction motor, that friction can be overcome. You will find reference to particles in space here : - http://problemswithrelativity.com/#constancy
Tom.




> On 08 May 2020 at 15:17 mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Tom,
> 
> You noticed my attempt to simplify!! What I didn't mention in my 
> explanation was that, in a photon, as well as each meon in the loop 
> chasing the next one to it, it also chases its opposite number in the 
> other loop. For a single loop, there is only the one set of net circular 
> forces from one meon to the next. It is the action of each meon in one 
> loop chasing its opposite in the other loop that drives the total 
> two-loop photon up to the maximum speed it can manage in the local 
> environment against the friction produced by the viscosity of that local 
> environment. Where the photon is in 'empty' space, there is still the 
> background to travel through, so it loses energy as it moves, a red 
> shift. When near a star, there is more viscosity so it has to work 
> harder against more friction and its maximum speed will still be c, but 
> the numerical value may be near zero - especially when trying to escape 
> from a black hole.
> 
> Apologies for eliding over that...
> 
> Cheers
> Mike



More information about the Physics mailing list