[Physics] Cubic Atomic Model + Theory

[mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk]

Tom,

I thought I had answered your question in the best way, but here is 
more.

The mass and charge forces between meons in the two opposite loops of a 
photon act along the photon’s direction of travel. The sizes are

Mass		(M +/- qc/6) (-M-/+ qc/6)/r^2
Charge		(Qc -/+ qc/6) (-Qc +/-qc/6) /r^2

Where M is the adjusted Planck mass, Q the adjusted Planck charge, q the 
electron charge size, c light speed and r the distance between the 
loops.

The mass and charge are related in that M = Qc and MQ = h.  And q 
=sqrt(alpha/2pi)Q.

The distance between the loops r is almost zero, so the forces are very 
large. The effect of the charge side is to keep the loops together and 
the effect of the mass side is that the front loop is trying to keep 
away from the back loop (it is being chased) and the back loop is trying 
to maintain distance from the front loop (it is chasing).

The effect of the background viscosity is to oppose the force that is 
driving the photon towards its maximum speed within that background.

The difficulty you face with your system is in explaining where the 
extra energy comes from in driving non-locality.

  In my system, when an entangled photon is split into its two 
constituent loops, there is a tunnel formed between them. That tunnel 
excludes the background and so motion along the tunnel is without 
viscosity. So the two loops can move back and forth along the tunnel 
without a maximum speed and with no energy required. What is observable 
at the ends of the tunnel is the average of the loops’ properties over 
time. When enough disturbance is made to the tunnel (a ‘measurement’ for 
example) the tunnel closes and the two loop are trapped at whichever end 
they were in at that instant.

Hope that is better.

Cheers
Mike





On 2020-05-09 12:14, Tom Hollings wrote:
> Mike, regarding your answer to Arend. The real world can always be
> expressed by maths, but maths does not always express the real world.
> The maths may work out correctly, but have no correspondence in
> reality. Instead of doing the maths and then saying "this is possible,
> let's look for it", look for something (or find it by accident), and
> then do the maths to explain it. That sentence is simplified of
> course.
> Back to my posting. Instead of answering using SRT as I asked (and GRT
> if you think it is needed), you started talking about photons and
> meons and loops chasing each other. Just answer the question, or tell
> me where I am wrong. As I said in my previous post, yes, friction will
> act on a body, but when that body carries a source of power ie a
> reaction motor, that friction can be overcome. You will find reference
> to particles in space here : -
> http://problemswithrelativity.com/#constancy
> Tom.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 08 May 2020 at 15:17 mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Tom,
>> 
>> You noticed my attempt to simplify!! What I didn't mention in my
>> explanation was that, in a photon, as well as each meon in the loop
>> chasing the next one to it, it also chases its opposite number in the
>> other loop. For a single loop, there is only the one set of net 
>> circular
>> forces from one meon to the next. It is the action of each meon in one
>> loop chasing its opposite in the other loop that drives the total
>> two-loop photon up to the maximum speed it can manage in the local
>> environment against the friction produced by the viscosity of that 
>> local
>> environment. Where the photon is in 'empty' space, there is still the
>> background to travel through, so it loses energy as it moves, a red
>> shift. When near a star, there is more viscosity so it has to work
>> harder against more friction and its maximum speed will still be c, 
>> but
>> the numerical value may be near zero - especially when trying to 
>> escape
>> from a black hole.
>> 
>> Apologies for eliding over that...
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Mike