<html><head></head><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:16px"><div id="yiv7506991755"><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476959299827_4319"><div style="color:#000;background-color:#fff;font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:16px;" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476959299827_4318"><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476959299827_4317">Arend, <br clear="none"></div><div id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_83913"><br clear="none"></div><div id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_83914">Apologies if this is redundant ... please reply with a link to your current~latest 'description of gravitation'.</div><div id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_83990">Thank you,</div><div id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_83992"><br clear="none"></div><div id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_83994">Jamie Rose<br clear="none"></div><div id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_83899"><span></span></div><div class="yiv7506991755qtdSeparateBR" id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_83900"><br clear="none"><br clear="none"></div></div></div></div><div class=".yiv7506991755yahoo_quoted" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476959299827_4321"> <div id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_83905" style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:16px;"> <div id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_83904" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px;"> <div dir="ltr" id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_83903"> <font id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_83902" size="2" face="Arial"> </font><div class="qtdSeparateBR" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476959299827_4320"><br><br></div><div class="yiv7506991755yqt7317930725" id="yiv7506991755yqtfd82479"><hr id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_83901" size="1"> <b id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_83910"><span id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_83909" style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Arend Lammertink <lamare@gmail.com><br clear="none"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">To:</span></b> arbab.ibrahim@gmail.com <br clear="none"><b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Cc:</span></b> General Physics and Natural Philosophy discussion list <physics@tuks.nl><br clear="none"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Sent:</span></b> Wednesday, October 19, 2016 12:14 PM<br clear="none"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Subject:</span></b> [Physics] Maxwell extension<br clear="none"> </div></div><div class="yiv7506991755yqt7317930725" id="yiv7506991755yqtfd13494"> <div class="yiv7506991755y_msg_container" id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84001"><br clear="none"><div id="yiv7506991755"><div dir="ltr" id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84000"><div id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_83999"><div id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_83998"><div id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_83997"><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476959299827_4322">Hello Arbab,<br clear="none"><br clear="none"></div>Thank you for your reply. I know Koen van Vlaenderen well. In fact, he was one of the first to criticize my original description of gravitation. <br clear="none"><br clear="none"></div>I've cc-ed the physics mailinglist, so your papers may be discussed.<br clear="none"><br clear="none"></div>Best regards,<br clear="none"><br clear="none"></div>Arend.<br clear="none"><div id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84011"><div id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84010"><div class="yiv7506991755gmail_extra" id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84009"><br clear="all"><div id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84008"><div class="yiv7506991755gmail_signature" id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84007"><div dir="ltr" id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84006"><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476959299827_4325"><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476959299827_4324"><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476959299827_4323"><br clear="none"></div>Arend Lammertink, MScEE,<br clear="none"></div>Goor, The Netherlands.<br clear="none"><br clear="none"></div>Please note that I'm currently overwhelmed with e-mails. If you're interested in discussing science and/or physics, please consider subscribing to the mailing list I created for that purpose:<br clear="none"><br clear="none"><a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics">http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics</a><br clear="none"><div><div><div><br clear="none"></div></div></div></div></div></div>
<br clear="none"><div class="yiv7506991755gmail_quote" id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84018">On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Arbab I. Arbab <span dir="ltr"><<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:arbab.ibrahim@gmail.com" target="_blank" href="mailto:arbab.ibrahim@gmail.com">arbab.ibrahim@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br clear="none"><blockquote class="yiv7506991755gmail_quote" id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84017" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div dir="ltr" id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84016">Dear <span style="font-size:16px;">Arend Lammertink,</span><div><span style="font-size:16px;">Thank you very much for your kind message. I really do agree that Maxwell equations are but not complete. Extension of Maxwell equations were met with rejection without reason. I have also made some publications in this regard. The first one appeared in </span></div><div><span style="font-size:16px;"><a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2009/PP-17-03.PDF">http://www.ptep-online.com/ index_files/2009/PP-17-03.PDF</a></span><br clear="none"></div><div><span style="font-size:16px;"> and</span></div><div><span style="font-size:16px;"><a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://cpb.iphy.ac.cn/fileup/PDF/2013-3-030301.pdf">http://cpb.iphy.ac.cn/fileup/ PDF/2013-3-030301.pdf</a></span><br clear="none"></div><div><span style="font-size:16px;"><br clear="none"></span></div><div id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84015"><span style="font-size:16px;">In these papers I showed that the extension is inevitable</span><span style="font-size:16px;">. There is an engineer in the Netherlands who share the same ideas. His name is </span><span class="yiv7506991755m_9015437407033373154gmail-collaborators-list-item-name" id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84014" style="color:rgb(0,128,255);display:inline-block;height:20px;vertical-align:baseline;margin-right:10px;margin-bottom:5px;outline:0px;font-family:roboto, arial, sans-serif;line-height:1.3;white-space:nowrap;"><a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" class="yiv7506991755m_9015437407033373154gmail-collaborators-list-item" target="_blank" href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Koen_Van_Vlaenderen" style="color:rgb(0,128,255);display:inline-block;height:20px;vertical-align:baseline;margin-right:10px;margin-bottom:5px;outline:0px;font-family:roboto, arial, sans-serif;font-size:17.5px;line-height:22.75px;">Koen van Vlaendere</a>n. I suggest if you are interested to organize an international </span></div><div><span class="yiv7506991755m_9015437407033373154gmail-collaborators-list-item-name" style="color:rgb(0,128,255);display:inline-block;height:20px;vertical-align:baseline;margin-bottom:5px;outline:0px;font-family:roboto, arial, sans-serif;line-height:1.3;white-space:nowrap;margin-left:10px;">conference that deals with these shortcoming.</span></div><div><span class="yiv7506991755m_9015437407033373154gmail-collaborators-list-item-name" style="color:rgb(0,128,255);display:inline-block;height:20px;vertical-align:baseline;margin-bottom:5px;outline:0px;font-family:roboto, arial, sans-serif;line-height:1.3;white-space:nowrap;margin-left:10px;">Thank you and good luck.</span></div><div id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84046"><span class="yiv7506991755m_9015437407033373154gmail-collaborators-list-item-name" style="color:rgb(0,128,255);display:inline-block;height:20px;vertical-align:baseline;margin-bottom:5px;outline:0px;font-family:roboto, arial, sans-serif;line-height:1.3;white-space:nowrap;margin-left:10px;">Arbab</span></div></div><div class="yiv7506991755gmail_extra" id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84053"><div id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84052"><div class="yiv7506991755h5" id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84051"><br clear="none"><div class="yiv7506991755gmail_quote" id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84050">On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Arend Lammertink <span dir="ltr"><<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:lamare@gmail.com" target="_blank" href="mailto:lamare@gmail.com">lamare@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br clear="none"><blockquote class="yiv7506991755gmail_quote" id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84049" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Dear fellow dissident scientist,<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
I have spent a lot of time analyzing the history of Maxwell's<br clear="none">
equations and how those led to Relativity as well as Quantum Field<br clear="none">
Theory. Based on that analysis, I found an astonishing inconsistency<br clear="none">
in Maxwell's equations, which led to an incomplete model for<br clear="none">
electromagnetics.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
For instance, Maxwell's equations predict only one type of<br clear="none">
electromagnetic waves to exist, namely transverse waves, while in<br clear="none">
actual fact at least two types of waves are known to exist, namely the<br clear="none">
"near" and "far" fields:<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" id="yiv7506991755yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1476901243203_84054" target="_blank" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_and_far_field">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Near_and_far_field</a><br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
By correcting this inconsistency, we can come to a Unified model in an<br clear="none">
elegant, consistent and natural way. Please find my abstract below.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
You can read the full article at my personal website:<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index.php/Main/AnExceptionallyElegantTheoryOfEverything">http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index. php/Main/AnExceptionallyElegan tTheoryOfEverything</a><br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
I hope you are able and willing to consider my proposal and let me<br clear="none">
know what you think about it. To me, it contains the answer I believe<br clear="none">
science has been looking for, but of course you may differ in opinion.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
Kindest regards,<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
Arend Lammertink, MScEE,<br clear="none">
Goor, The Netherlands.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
P.S. I found your email address at:<br clear="none">
<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://editionsassailly.com/livres/climont%20full%20list%20htm.htm">http://editionsassailly.com/li vres/climont%20full%20list%20h tm.htm</a><br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
----<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
Abstract<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
In a previous article, we stated that all currently known areas of<br clear="none">
Physics' theories converge naturally into one Unified Theory of<br clear="none">
Everything once we make one fundamental change to Maxwell's aether<br clear="none">
model. In that article, we explored the history of Maxwell's equations<br clear="none">
and considered a number of reasons for the need to revise Maxwell's<br clear="none">
equations. In this article, we will make the mathematical case that<br clear="none">
there is a hole in Maxwell's equations which should not be there,<br clear="none">
given that we started with the same basic hypothesis as Maxwell did:<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
A physical, fluid-like medium called "aether" exists.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
Maxwell did not explicitly use this underlying hypothesis, but<br clear="none">
abstracted it away. This leads to a mathematically inconsistent model<br clear="none">
wherein, for example, units of measurements do not match in his<br clear="none">
definition for the electric potential field. By correcting this<br clear="none">
obvious flaw in the model and extending it with a definition for the<br clear="none">
gravity field, we obtain a simple, elegant, complete and<br clear="none">
mathematically consistent "theory of everything" without "gauge<br clear="none">
freedom", the fundamental theoretical basis for Quantum Weirdness<br clear="none">
which we must therefore reject.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
[...]<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
Conclusions<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
By working out standard textbook fluid dynamic vector theory for an<br clear="none">
ideal, compressible, non-viscous Newtonian fluid, we have established<br clear="none">
that Maxwell's equations are mathematically inconsistent, given that<br clear="none">
these are supposed to describe the electromagnetic field from the<br clear="none">
aether hypothesis. Since our effort is a direct extension of Paul<br clear="none">
Stowe and Barry Mingst' aether model, we have come to a complete<br clear="none">
mathematically consistent "field theory of everything". And we found<br clear="none">
"Maxwell's hole" to be the original flaw in the standard model that<br clear="none">
led to both relativity and Quantum Mechanics, which should thus both<br clear="none">
be rejected.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
----<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
</blockquote></div><br clear="none"><br clear="all"><div><br clear="none"></div></div></div><span class="yiv7506991755HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">-- <br clear="none"></font></span><div class="yiv7506991755m_9015437407033373154gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><br clear="none">------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ---------------<br clear="none"><b>A. I. Arbab, PhD, MInst.P., CPhys., FRAS</b><div><b>Professor,<br clear="none">Dept. of Physics, College of Science, ِQassim University, KSA.<br clear="none"><a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Arbab_Arbab">https://www.researchgate.net/ profile/Arbab_Arbab</a><br clear="none"><font color="#0000ee"><u><a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://staffpages.uofk.edu/arbab-arbab/">http://staffpages.uofk.edu/ arbab-arbab/</a></u></font></b></div><div><b><font color="#0000ee"><u><a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://www.livedna.net/?dna=249.1286">http://www.livedna.net/?dna= 249.1286</a><br clear="none"></u></font>Mobile: <a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" href="">+966550790379</a><br clear="none"></b></div><div><b><br clear="none"></b></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br clear="none"></div></div></div></div></div><br clear="none">_______________________________________________<br clear="none">Physics mailing list<br clear="none"><a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:Physics@tuks.nl" target="_blank" href="mailto:Physics@tuks.nl">Physics@tuks.nl</a><br clear="none"><a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics">http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics</a><br clear="none"><br clear="none"><br clear="none"></div> </div></div><div class="yiv7506991755yqt7317930725" id="yiv7506991755yqtfd24595"> </div></div><div class="yiv7506991755yqt7317930725" id="yiv7506991755yqtfd39579"> </div></div></div></body></html>