<div dir="ltr">No, I think that experimentation is the most important part of theory development; math should be applied more as an adjunct to explain observed facts, since math has the unfortunate property of allowing an individual to conjure up whatever universe they please, whether we live in it or not! That is why there are thousands of theories and only one reality!!<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Hans van Leunen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jleunen1941@kpnmail.nl" target="_blank">jleunen1941@kpnmail.nl</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">If you do not comprehend sufficiently of essential parts of mathematics, then it is impossible to understand and decide on the fundamentals of physical reality.<div>Hans<br><blockquote style="margin-right:0px;margin-left:15px">----Origineel Bericht----<br>Van : <a href="mailto:1948emery6@gmail.com" target="_blank">1948emery6@gmail.com</a><br>Datum : 22/10/2016 13:49<br>Aan : <a href="mailto:physics@tuks.nl" target="_blank">physics@tuks.nl</a><br>Onderwerp : Re: [Physics] Arguments for or against the variable time (of Relativity)<div><div class="h5"><br><br><div dir="ltr">
FOR THE VAST MAJORITY OF CREATION -
<b>LINEAL</b> TIME DOES NOT EXIST. END OF DISCUSSION SNICKER - EVEN EINSTEIN FIGURED THAT OUT
<br>
<br>
<a href="https://www.academia.edu/20275104/THE_ILLUSION_OF_TIME" target="_blank">https://www.academia.edu/<wbr>20275104/THE_ILLUSION_OF_TIME</a>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 12:40 PM, O. Serret
<span><<a>o.serret@free.fr</a>></span> wrote:
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 0.8ex;border-left:1.0px rgb(204,204,204) solid;padding-left:1.0ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="FONT-SIZE:12.0pt;FONT-FAMILY:Calibri;COLOR:rgb(0,0,0)">
<div>
<font face="Courier New">> So what is it that you want to discuss, the concept of time or the results of Lorentz transforms?</font>
</div>
<div>
<font face="Courier New"></font>
</div>
<div>
<font face="Courier New">I would like to discuss of the MEASURE of the proper time (or the PROOF of the proper time existence)</font>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>______________________________
<u></u><u></u>_________________
<br> Physics mailing list
<br>
<a>Physics@tuks.nl</a>
<br>
<a href="http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics" target="_blank">http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/
<u></u><u></u>mailman/listinfo/physics</a>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div><br></div></div></blockquote><br><p></p></div><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Physics mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Physics@tuks.nl">Physics@tuks.nl</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/physics</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>