<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Hi Olivier,<br><br></div> Yes, early on I entertained the idea that some for of gravitational frame dragging might occur, but in more recent times I have abandoned that idea and believe more in a Lorentz ether (a single preferred frame of reference for light). <br></div>The conspiracy of light is the change in the rate of clocks and lengths that occurs with motion that "conspire" to prevent us from detecting an anisotropic light speed in any direction, but this is not due to gravitational causes. <br><br></div>Doug<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 3:37 AM, O. Serret <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:o.serret@free.fr" target="_blank">o.serret@free.fr</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="FONT-SIZE:12pt;FONT-FAMILY:'Calibri';COLOR:#000000">
<div>Hi Doug,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thank you for your explanations.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>About Michelson-Morley experiment, </div>
<div>you make the hypothesis of a “Gravitational Frame Dragging Theory” or of a
“Conspiracy of Light”, </div>
<div>i.e. a change in the properties of light (by gravity) in order that light
would become roughly isotropic on celerity.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Is my understanding of your hypothesis correct ?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Best regards</div></div></div></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Physics mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Physics@tuks.nl">Physics@tuks.nl</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/physics</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>