<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="line-height:115%;font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">Thank you very much, Thomas
Goodey</span> and Arend Lammertink<span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="line-height:115%;font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">I also wish to emphasize
on this very same point. At present, matter is not a fundamental concept
because we do not know what matter is and what its properties (if any) are.
However, I hope you would agree that, for an entity to have objective reality
and positive existence in space, it has to have a substance (stuff). I propose
this substance is provided by matter. If accepted, this would make matter the most
fundamental concept of all physical theories. It can supply a uniform material
for structure of atoms, subatomic particles, and much smaller matter-particles
structuring these. See; </span><span style="color:green"><a href="http://vixra.org/abs/1206.0048">http://vixra.org/abs/1206.0048</a></span><span style="line-height:115%;font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial"><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="line-height:115%;font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">Matter and mass are quite
different. Matter is a real entity but mass is a functional entity. Matter,
being real, provides substance to all real entities. Mass is only a
mathematical relation between external force on a body and body’s acceleration
in the direction of force. It is an attribute of matter-body. It is often used
as equivalent to matter-content of a body. Since we have no reference to form a
measuring scale for matter, we are compelled to use convenient attribute of
matter as equivalent to its matter-content. We normally use mass or weight for
this purpose. See; </span><a href="http://vixra.org/abs/1105.0034">http://vixra.org/abs/1105.0034</a><span style="line-height:115%;font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial"><span></span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="line-height:115%;font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">Nainan.</span><b style="font-size:large"><span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:115%;color:rgb(51,51,51);letter-spacing:-0.25pt"><span></span></span></b></p></div><div><br></div><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div style="text-align:center">* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br><span style="color:rgb(51,51,255)">All physical phenomena, related to matter, are logically explained by alternative concept, presented in 'MATTER (Re-examined)'.</span><br><a href="http://www.matterdoc.info" target="_blank">http://www.matterdoc.info</a> </div></div></div>
</div>