<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.23588">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Sorry if I came across poorly. Sure, I would
examine your paper.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>On a separate point, it seems to me that whatever
characteristics the aether might have, it MUST have some "effect", that is, some
detectable result. If the aether has NO detectable effects, how coulld it
be said to exist?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>I happen to have a similar issue with "neutrinos"
which are described as having no characteristics, mo mass, no charge, etc.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>In both cases, if you can find any "detectable
effect" THEN you have a shot at confirming that the entity exists.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>I also note that some of you inn the Group DO
understand such things, where my criticism was more against the members who do
not have the needed education. In some ways, you are following along
Michelson's thinking where he intended to prove that the aether DID exist, but
when his experiment never showed any evidence, Michelson came to conclude that
the aether did not exist (because it has no detectable effects).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Anything which has extremely minimal effect to try
to detect, and you wind up like Michelson-Morley, where they set up their
experiment to "prove that the aether existed" but then they were surprised by
the evidence (or lack thereof) which caused them to conclude exactly the
opposite.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>I strongly encourage ALL physicists to apply the
most strict logic they can, to find whatever might be waiting for them.
What drives me crazy (very commonly in the "mainstream physics community") is
that very sloppy logic is used, where little of value is possible.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Sorry that I had sounded like a jerk. I just
wish ALL Physicists would "massively research and examine historical records"
where our communnity might have a chance of finding valuable
insights.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Carl Johnson</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>