<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.E-mailStijl18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body bgcolor=white lang=NL link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Dear Carl,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.5pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;background:#ECEFF2'>It is not at all difficult to show that quantum physics can be unified with gravitation. It requires a reinterpretation of the wave function of elementary particles. It is known that the squared modulus of the wave function can be interpreted as a density distribution of the locations where the elementary particle could or will be detected. These locations form a coherent swarm. Now accept the idea that this swarm represents the landing locations in a hopping path in which the particles existed for a very small instant. Next consider a field that is affected by the short impinging event. As a result the field vibrates and the vibration is described by a homogeneous second order partial wave equation. Such equations offer solutions in the form of spherical shape keeping fronts. The integration of such solution over a long enough period results in the Green's function of the field.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>The convolution of this Green's function with the location density distribution of the swarm results in the contribution of the elementary particle to the deformation of the field. In the presence of a set of elementary particles the field will show the deformation that is due to the set. With other words the field plays the role of the gravitation field.</span><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>The conclusion is that elementary particles do not require the Higgs field to be able to deform the gravitation field.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>A slightly more extensive version of this explanation can be found in </span><span lang=EN-US style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>A simple model by Hans van Leunen</span><span lang=EN-US> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><a href="https://doc.co/yvg1Bv"><span lang=EN-US>https://doc.co/yvg1Bv</span></a></span><span lang=EN-US style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>And the full model is available </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><a href="https://doc.co/WmxXCB"><span lang=EN-US>https://doc.co/WmxXCB</span></a></span> <span lang=EN-US><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>If you can disprove these explanations, then I am very interested in that prove. Otherwise, it is interesting to deliberate about why nobody came to this explanation much earlier because the explanation is rather simple.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Sincerely yours,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span lang=EN-US>Hans<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>Van:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> Physics [mailto:physics-bounces@tuks.nl] <b>Namens </b>cj@mb-soft.com<br><b>Verzonden:</b> dinsdag 17 januari 2017 22:59<br><b>Aan:</b> physics@tuks.nl<br><b>Onderwerp:</b> Re: [Physics] Physics Digest, Vol 4, Issue 9<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>Re:Gravity task force:</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>I think I want to volunteer to particcipate in this. However, I wonder whether I might be "compatible". When I was in Physics in the University of Chicago in the late </span>1960s, certainly the most popular subject of us Physics students was regardsing just what "gravitation" was. During my four years, I am sure OIO sat on various floors listening to at least fifteen Nobel Prize Laureates explain their personal perspectives, and it was fascinating that there was littlee agreement among them. When we students would later have our own (pizzas) many times I heard the comment of "how can we 'mere students' figure this out when Nobels (including Richard Feynman) did not seem able to really understand it. Sadly, I cannot say I am a lot smarter now than then. My contribution to your task force may be that I have HEARD really smart people who have thought about just wnat gravitation is.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>Indirectly, I may have another usefulness. Since </span>1990 (twenty seven years) I have known that the Kinetic Energy of the spinning Earth has trillions of times the energy that all seven billion of us use up every year as fossil fuels, Nuclear, etc. Around then, I realized that there are few waays to try to extract that spinning energy, except for two forms which use gyroscopes and one which uses pendulums. Gravity itself cannot supply any energy for us, but a gravitational field is necessary for both gyroscopes and pendulums to work. So our gravitational field has been intimately important to my Research. In early 2004, I built four prototypes which acttuallyy worked as extracting spinning energy from the Earth. Some Physicists inn the Ukraine found my web-page on my Research <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>( <a href="http://mb-soft.com/public2/earthrot.html">http://mb-soft.com/public2/earthrot.html</a> )<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>and they informed me that the Soviet union had been working on secret research (based on the other application of gyroscopes, which required that they use a geartrain of a million to one speed up, which never really worked due to all the friction.)</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>In any case, I have lived witth gravity for many years.</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>Carl Johnson</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div></div></body></html>