<div dir="ltr"><div><div>Impending disaster in Cosmology!<br><br></div> Just following on from my post last week, where I talked about issues with the CMBr aligning with our local motion through space. I just discovered that a number of researchers have been using new independent methods to verify our kinetic motion with respect to the "universe" in light of the suspicious CMBr data. What they have uncovered is that our apparent motion based on things like galactic aberration, is now measured to be 4-5X higher than that predicted by the CMBr - in the 1350 to 1730 km/s range! The kinetic dipole found using these new methods is also skewed about 25-30 degrees away from the original CMBr dipole direction. This huge velocity discrepancy is going to cause some serious problems with the Big Bang theory and everything they have attributed to the CMBr, because now it is looking more and more like the CMBr is mostly local radio signal contamination. I am going to be creating a youTube video about this soon, but for anyone wanting more info, here are some of the latest papers:The Colin paper was very interesting. - Doug<br><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""><br></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">Colin 2017 <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.09376">https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.09376</a></span></p>
<br></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Singal 2015 <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.6260">https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.6260</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Singal 2014 <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.4796">https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.4796</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Singal 2015 <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.4134">https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.4134</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Huterer, 2012 <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.6476">https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.6476</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Huterer 2015 <a href="http://www-personal.umich.edu/%7Ehuterer/Papers/kinematic_dipole_Yoon.pdf">http://www-personal.umich.edu/~huterer/Papers/kinematic_dipole_Yoon.pdf</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Rubart 2013 <a href="https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2013/07/aa21215-13.pdf">https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2013/07/aa21215-13.pdf</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Tiwari 2013 <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.1947">https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.1947</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.3970">https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.3970</a></p>
<span style="font-size:11pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Tiwari 2017 <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.06719">https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.06719</a></span></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Doug Marett <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dm88dm@gmail.com" target="_blank">dm88dm@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Just uploaded a new paper on the question of whether it is possible to measure the one-way speed of light. The paper is at <a href="http://conspiracyoflight.com/pdf/Oneway1.pdf" target="_blank">http://conspiracyoflight.com/<wbr>pdf/Oneway1.pdf</a><br><br></div>For a bit of background, I was considering performing a one-way EM propagation test over about 30 Km using GPS disciplined clocks at either end to measure the propagation time. From the lit, various authors have reported detecting our rotational velocity this way, or even a sidereal velocity (for example Torr and Kolen, using coaxial cable and rubidium clocks). I decided to work through it in an Excel file to figure out what the result should be. My thinking is based on the papers about clock synchronization published by Herbert Ives and Ron Hatch. So this paper is really an informal examination of what one might expect, with lots of pictures and diagrams. I am sure it isn't perfect so if there are any errors I apologize in advance, this paper is more exploratory than anything else. <br><br></div><div>sincerely,<br></div><div><br>Doug<br><br></div><a href="http://www.conspiracyoflight.com" target="_blank">www.conspiracyoflight.com</a><br><br></div>P.S. - this exercise also seemed to uncover some bizarre alignments between the cosmic microwave background radiation anisotropy and the ecliptic and the solar apex motion of the solar system, which has me a little spooked. I am going to investigate this further, but these alignments almost suggest that the CMBr anisotropy may be due to our local motion around the sun or our sun's motion around the galaxy. <br><div><br></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>