<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.23588">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>I may have a better (and simpler) thought to
add. I keep rantinng about Riemannian, but maybe I should n oted noted
somethinng better.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Whn Newton came up with his Laws of Motion, they
obnbnly worked in one and two dimensions. So Newton coulld never have
solved "gyroscopes" or "pendulums" as those are both three dimensional
processes. It took Euler to extend Newton's Laws to three dimensions (with
the set of three Differential Euler equations to solve such three dimensional
processes. The fact that Lissajous orbits are three dimensional, maybe
extending Newton's gravitational Vector equation with Euler's three dimensional
math, might provide the "three dimensional gravitational form". That
MIGHT then solve all sorts of things, including all the stuff you aspire
to.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>If this is so, that might suggest that
somebody has ALREADY done the Euler math for Gravitation, probably inn some
University. I don't think Wiki has it but it is probably just too
logically complicated for most of Wiki. If any of you know people in any
University math department, I suggest that you ask if anyone has done the
three-dimensional math for gravitational Vectors. If so, you may
already have everythinng you dreaam of.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Carl</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML>