<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.23588">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>For many years, I have noticed and tried to point
out that Wolfgang Pauli had made a huge logical blunder 88 years ago when he
mistakenly had tried to analyze Nuclear Spin as though it was a Scalar quantity,
and not the true Vector quantity it actually is.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><A
href="http://mb-soft.com/public4/neutrino.html">http://mb-soft.com/public4/neutrino.html</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>My brain apparently works slowly, as it only is NOW
that my "hero" Richard Feynman SHOULD have pointed out to me 50 years ago when I
was around him, that his Feynman Diagrams definitely apply.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>He had even used the example of "neutron decaying
into proton and electron" and "fusing an electron and a proton together to form
a neutron", which is STILL used as his "posterchild". </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>What had not occurred to me that, using his
"reversed time" in his Feynman Diagrams, I (and everyone else) needed to think
about his "posterchild" if it also involved a neutrino. It
cannot.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Sure, in one direction, where the neutron is coming
apart, fine, that "an additional particle, a neutrino" was also created.
But the interessting part is "the other time direction". As Physicists, we
had to do calculations to determine when "two-body head-on collisions"
occurred. But if that "creation process of a neutron" instead had to
involve a "three-body head-on collision, at exactly the same location and
exactly the same time (that is, proton, electron and neutrino) then the
calculated statistics are "never". (The event also requires that a photon
shows up to provide the energy necessary of the Neutron Self-Binding Energy, to
fuse the proton and electron together, also at the same moment and at the same
location). </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>In other words, I had been right that Pauli had
made a logical error in thinking of Nuclear Spin as a Scalar quantity, but even
more compellinng is to apply Feynman's "backward time" of his Feynman Diagrams,
where it conclusively proves that no neutrinos could have anything to do with
any neutrons or any Beta Decay processes.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Carl Johnson</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML>