<div dir="ltr"><div>Hello Hans.</div><div><br></div>My comment at Vixra on Mass- and Field Deformation:<br><span style="color:rgb(42,46,46);font-family:"Helvetica Neue",arial,sans-serif;font-size:15px">Dutch scientists play a big roll in theories about Gravitation and the (expanding) universe. Your paper is an interesting approach and may be put in line with these scientists. I agree with the comment of Rodney Savidge: It would be rewarding to include a glossary providing clear definitions of (in effect justifying the use of) the many esoteric terms (e.g., hop landings, modules, etc.).</span> <div><br></div><div>Best regards.</div><div>Ruud Loeffen. <br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 1:40 AM Hans van Leunen <<a href="mailto:jleunen1941@kpnmail.nl">jleunen1941@kpnmail.nl</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Please read "Mass and Field Deformation"; <a href="http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0564" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0564</a><br>
All massive objects are recurrently regenerated and the volume of the universe keeps expanding.<br>
Greathings,<br>
Hans van Leunen<br>
<br>
>----Origineel Bericht----<br>
>Van : <a href="mailto:ilja.schmelzer@gmail.com" target="_blank">ilja.schmelzer@gmail.com</a><br>
>Datum : 31/10/2018 19:33<br>
>Aan : <a href="mailto:physics@tuks.nl" target="_blank">physics@tuks.nl</a><br>
>Onderwerp : Re: [Physics] Physics Digest, Vol 19, Issue 5<br>
><br>
>> I have a related question for you. Since the universe is expanding,<br>
>> that means that all matter is growing larger. Since the tools that we<br>
>> use are also getting larger, how would we notice?<br>
><br>
>No, what is held together by forces (including the gravitational<br>
>force) remains of the same size.<br>
><br>
>So, the size of everything on Earth, but also the Solar system, the<br>
>galaxies, and even the galaxy clusters remains unchanged in size.<br>
><br>
>> Is this why fossils<br>
>> from millions of years ago seem larger than today?<br>
><br>
>Certainly not.<br>
><br>
>_______________________________________________<br>
>Physics mailing list<br>
><a href="mailto:Physics@tuks.nl" target="_blank">Physics@tuks.nl</a><br>
><a href="http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics</a><br>
><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Physics mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Physics@tuks.nl" target="_blank">Physics@tuks.nl</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><font face="comic sans ms, sans-serif" size="2"><b>Ruud Loeffen</b></font><div><font face="monospace, monospace">Paardestraat32</font></div><div><font face="monospace, monospace">6131HC Sittard</font></div><div><a href="http://www.human-DNA.org" style="font-size:12.8px" target="_blank">http://www.human-DNA.org</a><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>