<div dir="ltr"><div>Hello Soretna.</div><div><br></div>Interesting information that you provided. Thanks for the links. Basically I agree with your statement: "
we do not have any actual evidence of quarks or the validity of the SM whatsoever at this point. You may be interested in my video: <span style="background-color:rgb(232,234,237)"> </span>
<span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:107%;font-family:Roboto;color:rgb(3,3,3);background:rgb(249,249,249)">“</span><span style="line-height:107%"><a href="http://bit.ly/3cDZbre" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><b style=""><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:107%;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(0,176,80)">Expansion of the universe and earth” </span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11pt;line-height:107%;font-family:Arial,sans-serif">http://bit.ly/3cDZbre</span></a><font face="arial, sans-serif"> If you are in a hurry: start at 6.00 minutes. You will understand why I am sure that there are no quarks. Quarks exist only as a mathematical concept to perform calculations. Our solar system is an atom, that expanded for 4.5 billion years. In that period it grew from a nucleus with electrons to a sun with planets. Of course it changed as I changed also from being born to being an old man aged 72 years. But basically I have still the construction of that baby.</font><a href="http://bit.ly/3cDZbre" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11pt;line-height:107%;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black;text-decoration-line:none"><br>
</span></a></span><div><span style="line-height:107%"><font face="arial, sans-serif"><br></font></span></div><div><span style="line-height:107%"><font face="arial, sans-serif">Best regards.</font></span></div><div><span style="line-height:107%"><font face="arial, sans-serif">Ruud Loeffen.</font></span></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Op wo 6 mei 2020 om 06:01 schreef Soretna <<a href="mailto:illumination00@gmail.com">illumination00@gmail.com</a>>:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Since this topic appears to be taboo at some level, I believe a history lesson is essential to address fundamental problem that currently plagues our study and even beliefs. I think a well researched/documented approach is best to eliminate the concern of bias and to this end I must highly recommend that anyone on this list pick up the following book for *historical context* of where physics went wrong ~130 years ago and has yet still not been able to recover:<div><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Dynamic-Ether-Cosmic-Space-Correcting/dp/0997405716" target="_blank">https://www.amazon.com/Dynamic-Ether-Cosmic-Space-Correcting/dp/0997405716</a> (there is no affiliate link there, so no fear in clicking)<br></div><div><br></div><div>Note you may ignore the non-historical information, if you wish, as I personally did not find much value in those parts, BUT the treatment of the historical information in this compendium contains impeccable research that I think anyone here will very much appreciate.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 12:46 PM Soretna <<a href="mailto:illumination00@gmail.com" target="_blank">illumination00@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Perhaps I should have gone a step further in my last hasty reply: if the Michelson–Morley experiment was (and various other subsequent experiments were) not null, then would that invalidate the SM and by extension quarks?<div></div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 12:15 PM Soretna <<a href="mailto:illumination00@gmail.com" target="_blank">illumination00@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I disagree, we do not have any actual evidence of quarks or the validity of the SM whatsoever at this point.<div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 7:25 AM Ilja Schmelzer <<a href="mailto:ilja.schmelzer@gmail.com" target="_blank">ilja.schmelzer@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">2020-05-03 2:02 GMT+06:30, Soretna <<a href="mailto:illumination00@gmail.com" target="_blank">illumination00@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
> I recently stumbled upon a fresh new perspective by Franklin Hu (always<br>
> love to find such unique perspectives) that I thought I should share for<br>
> review and consideration:<br>
> <a href="http://franklinhu.com/theory.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://franklinhu.com/theory.html</a><br>
<br>
A rough look at this reveals:<br>
<br>
I see something about protons, electrons, and neutrons, but nothing<br>
about quarks, three generations of them as well as of leptons. So, it<br>
looks like the SM as a whole is not covered.<br>
<br>
So, not worth to be considered.<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Physics mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Physics@tuks.nl" target="_blank">Physics@tuks.nl</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Physics mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Physics@tuks.nl" target="_blank">Physics@tuks.nl</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><font face="comic sans ms, sans-serif" size="2"><b>Ruud Loeffen</b></font><div><a href="http://www.human-DNA.org" style="font-size:12.8px" target="_blank">http://www.human-DNA.org</a><br></div></div></div></div></div></div>