[Physics] Why is a new beginning in physics necessary? *

[Hans van Leunen]

Dear Arend,

You must distinguish between dimensions and degrees of freedom. In three
dimensional space, six degrees of freedom exist. Half of them are rotations.

If you start by taking the orthomodular lattice as a foundation of physical
reality, then you quickly land in a model that exists of a separable Hilbert
space and its non-separable companion Hilbert space. Hilbert spaces can only
cope with number systems, which are division rings. The quaternions
represent the division ring with the highest dimension and are ideally
suited as a medium for storage of dynamic geometric data. It is very easy to
turn this base model into a dynamic model in which a subspace scans over the
Hilbert spaces as a function of progression.

See: docs.com/hans-van-leunen or TheHilbertBookTestModel by Hans van Leunen
https://doc.co/WmxXCB

 

Sincerely yours,

Hans van Leunen

 

Van: Physics [mailto:physics-bounces at tuks.nl] Namens Master Inventor
Verzonden: donderdag 8 december 2016 17:49
Aan: Arend Lammertink <lamare at gmail.com>
CC: General Physics and Natural Philosophy discussion list <physics at tuks.nl>
Onderwerp: [Physics] Why is a new beginning in physics necessary? *

 

Arend Lammertink and others interested in a new beginning for physics,

 

I have not read your paper on the errors in Maxwell's Equations.  But
similar conclusions were drawn by Oleg D. Jifimenko, who was a physics
professor at West Virginia University until his death in 2009.  He wrote a
number of books on electromagnetic theory and gravity.  He showed that two
of Maxwell's four equations were not fundamental relationships and he went
on to replace them with more fundamental relationships.  

 

Newton is the father of modern physics.  But those who followed did little
to extend and expand his discoveries in the intervening 300 years.  The
Hamilton and Lagrangian methods put Newtonian mechanics in a very useful
format for problem solving, but they also froze the laws in a 4-dimensional
linear framework.  As a result non-linear mechanical phenomena cannot be
modeled by these methods.  I have build at least one machine that violates
the conservation laws of Newton's mechanics.  (Please don't blame Newton!
He organized observations into mathematical form; it was the job of those
who followed to expand those discoveries.)  

 

The greatest omission of classical physics is  the failure to deal with
rotations.  Because rotations are non-linear, physicist wrote simplified
linear relationships to deal with them.  They failed to consider that
rotations add 4 more dimensions to all the laws of physics (3 rotations in
space and one rotation in time).  The physics we were taught compresses 8
dimensions into 4 dimensions, resulting in strange and unexplained behavior,
such as quantum mechanics.  

 

If physics is to have a new beginning it must be expanded to a framework
having 8-dimensions. 

 

 







Maurice Daniel, Inventor/Physicist

mdaniel at masterinventor.com <mailto:mdaniel at masterinventor.com> 

 





 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20161208/f36911de/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 17131 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20161208/f36911de/attachment.jpg>