[Physics] Why is a new beginning in physics necessary? *

[Master Inventor]

Dear Hans van Leunen,

It is clear from your response to my proposed 8-dimensional physics that your math skills exceed mine.  I am an inventor/physicist and my interest is in practical physics that can be used to build advanced machines beyond what is now possible.  There were hundreds of thousands of sightings of alien spacecraft flying in our skies during the last half century.  None of these spacecraft, from many different worlds, propel themselves by shooting reaction mass out their tails.  We need an expanded physics that can provide us with practical engineering equations that allow us to build such vehicles ourselves.  

As a first step, rotations of both space and time must be recognized as dimensions and not simply as degrees of freedom.  In modern physics we solve problems dealing with rotations using linear engineering simplifications (such as Hilbert space).  The simplifications work most of the time, but they disregard other possibilities that exist in angular space.  The laws of electromagnetism and gravity are written in only 4 dimensions.  Think of the many possibilities that would emerge if these field equations were expanded to 8 dimensions!  

My experimentation in these areas suggest that the conservation laws do not always hold in 8-dimensional physics.  That would mean that it is possible to build machines that violate the conservation of energy and the conservation of momentum.  It is clear that alien spacecraft routinely violate the conservation of momentum.  It is also clear that they have very powerful energy sources that we don't know about, or they violate the conservation of energy using some sort of "free energy" source.  

It is clear that magnetic fields have some sort of vortex field component hidden within them; or another words a rotational component, perhaps orthogonal to linear space?  

In tornadoes (a matter vortex) pieces of straw are sometimes shot through glass windows without breaking the glass.  Other similar phenomena have been documented.  This is obviously a multi-dimensional phenomena.  

Think about the physics, not the math.  What is the structure of time and space?  Once you can create a model of how it works you can then apply the math.  Then you can give it to the engineers and build incredible machines.  
 
Enough for now.



---Maurice Daniel---

On Dec 8, 2016, at 1:23 PM, Hans van Leunen wrote:

> Dear Arend,
> You must distinguish between dimensions and degrees of freedom. In three dimensional space, six degrees of freedom exist. Half of them are rotations.
> If you start by taking the orthomodular lattice as a foundation of physical reality, then you quickly land in a model that exists of a separable Hilbert space and its non-separable companion Hilbert space. Hilbert spaces can only cope with number systems, which are division rings. The quaternions represent the division ring with the highest dimension and are ideally suited as a medium for storage of dynamic geometric data. It is very easy to turn this base model into a dynamic model in which a subspace scans over the Hilbert spaces as a function of progression.
> See: docs.com/hans-van-leunen or TheHilbertBookTestModel by Hans van Leunen https://doc.co/WmxXCB
>  
> Sincerely yours,
> Hans van Leunen
>  
> Van: Physics [mailto:physics-bounces at tuks.nl] Namens Master Inventor
> Verzonden: donderdag 8 december 2016 17:49
> Aan: Arend Lammertink <lamare at gmail.com>
> CC: General Physics and Natural Philosophy discussion list <physics at tuks.nl>
> Onderwerp: [Physics] Why is a new beginning in physics necessary? *
>  
> Arend Lammertink and others interested in a new beginning for physics,
>  
> I have not read your paper on the errors in Maxwell's Equations.  But similar conclusions were drawn by Oleg D. Jifimenko, who was a physics professor at West Virginia University until his death in 2009.  He wrote a number of books on electromagnetic theory and gravity.  He showed that two of Maxwell's four equations were not fundamental relationships and he went on to replace them with more fundamental relationships.  
>  
> Newton is the father of modern physics.  But those who followed did little to extend and expand his discoveries in the intervening 300 years.  The Hamilton and Lagrangian methods put Newtonian mechanics in a very useful format for problem solving, but they also froze the laws in a 4-dimensional linear framework.  As a result non-linear mechanical phenomena cannot be modeled by these methods.  I have build at least one machine that violates the conservation laws of Newton's mechanics.  (Please don't blame Newton!  He organized observations into mathematical form; it was the job of those who followed to expand those discoveries.)  
>  
> The greatest omission of classical physics is  the failure to deal with rotations.  Because rotations are non-linear, physicist wrote simplified linear relationships to deal with them.  They failed to consider that rotations add 4 more dimensions to all the laws of physics (3 rotations in space and one rotation in time).  The physics we were taught compresses 8 dimensions into 4 dimensions, resulting in strange and unexplained behavior, such as quantum mechanics.  
>  
> If physics is to have a new beginning it must be expanded to a framework having 8-dimensions. 
>  
>  
> <image001.jpg>
> 
> 
> 
> Maurice Daniel, Inventor/Physicist
> mdaniel at masterinventor.com
>  
> 
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Physics mailing list
> Physics at tuks.nl
> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics





Maurice Daniel, Master Inventor
mdaniel at masterinventor.com




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20161208/fb42114d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Maurice Photo, Small Size.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 17131 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20161208/fb42114d/attachment.jpg>