[Physics] New beginning in physics necessary?

[Nainan]

Thank you very much, Thomas Goodey and Arend Lammertink

I also wish to emphasize on this very same point. At present, matter is not
a fundamental concept because we do not know what matter is and what its
properties (if any) are. However, I hope you would agree that, for an
entity to have objective reality and positive existence in space, it has to
have a substance (stuff). I propose this substance is provided by matter.
If accepted, this would make matter the most fundamental concept of all
physical theories. It can supply a uniform material for structure of atoms,
subatomic particles, and much smaller matter-particles structuring these.
See; http://vixra.org/abs/1206.0048

Matter and mass are quite different. Matter is a real entity but mass is a
functional entity. Matter, being real, provides substance to all real
entities. Mass is only a mathematical relation between external force on a
body and body’s acceleration in the direction of force. It is an attribute
of matter-body. It is often used as equivalent to matter-content of a body.
Since we have no reference to form a measuring scale for matter, we are
compelled to use convenient attribute of matter as equivalent to its
matter-content. We normally use mass or weight for this purpose. See;
http://vixra.org/abs/1105.0034

Nainan.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * *
All physical phenomena, related to matter, are logically explained by
alternative concept, presented in 'MATTER (Re-examined)'.
http://www.matterdoc.info
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20161213/5d90531d/attachment.html>