[Physics] Fwd: Re: expansion of mass

Tue Dec 20 15:04:36 CET 2016

Hi Ruud,

Thanks for sharing this. Based on clues derived from you book, I have
developed some geometries that most probably explains the physical
significance of Lorentz Factor . Here is the link:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/55i03093z93hc60/Lorentz%20Factor.pdf?dl=0

I have also updated the same on Quora.

https://bigquestionsofuniverse.quora.com/BIG-BATHROOM-UNIVERSE-PART-7

For dark energy please refer to following link:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/cnmo3qu77vtvibt/Dark%20Energy.pdf?dl=0

That is how I see it.

By the time discussion starts next month, please have a look,

Thanks,

Tufail

On 20 Dec 2016 12:51, "Ruud Loeffen" <rmmloeffen at gmail.com> wrote:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stavros Tassos <s.tassos at yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 3:30 PM
Subject: Σχετ: Re: expansion of mass
To: Ruud Loeffen <rmmloeffen at gmail.com>

Dear  Ruud
Thank you for the invitation to participate in the discussion which I
gladly accept, but please take into consideration my time limitations.
I went through your mind blowing gravitation and I think the that conforms
to the physical reality.
A few points from my side to consider.
1. It will be more appropriate to talk about growing earth and universe
than expanding since we both refer not to the "blowing" or decreasing in
density of a given quantity of mass.
2. In the same line of thought the Gravitational Constant G is not the
expansion rate of the universe, but rather the "stretching" rate of it,
which implies higher frequency with time, ie evolution, or in other words
more waves in the same absolute space.
3. There is no point of talking about elementary or other discrete
particles since the cosmos is a waving material continuum.

Of course I have no objections of posting any of my work.

Thank you for the wishes which I warmly reciprocate.

As for the difficulties the Greek people have, which we definitely do to
the greatest degree, it is a global problem of the 99% of people against
the 1% that has the real power in its hands.

With warmest regards
Stavros

Στάλθηκε από το Ταχυδρομείο Yahoo σε Android
<https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>

Στις Σάβ, 17 Δεκ, 2016 στις 9:20, ο χρήστηςRuud Loeffen
<rmmloeffen at gmail.com> έγραψε:
Hello Stavros.

How are you? Busy I think, because Greece needs a lot of support these days.
Did you see this news
<http://www.zmescience.com/science/news-science/seafloor-sensor-observatory-16122016/?utm_source=ZME+Science+Newsletter&utm_campaign=fa06b72f88-ZME_Science_Daily3_6_2015&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_3b5aad2288-fa06b72f88-242708965&ct=t(ZME_Science_Daily11_8_2014)>
: [image: Inline image 1]
I think you follow these items as much as possible.

Did you read Mind-blowing gravitation? The latest version is this one on
dropbox
<https://www.dropbox.com/s/03yrwkf5z7hhprg/Mind-blowing%20Gravitation.%20RMM%20Loeffen%2025%20Nov%202016.pdf?dl=0>.
I added appendix 4 about the expansion of the earth and mentioned your
paper. However: the link is not direct. If you agree (or have some
suggestions about text changes) let me know and perhaps you want to share a
direct link to your paper? This version with appendix 4 *is not public
available yet: it's ment for discussion and **developing**.*

Do you want to participate? We will start in January.

For now "Merry Christmas and a happy New Year" for you and your family as
for your nation Greece too.

Best regards.

Ruud Loeffen.

On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Ruud Loeffen <rmmloeffen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Stravros
>
>
>
> Thank you for your reply. I hope this will be a start of a very important
> approach to combine the premise of expansion of matter for
>
> - the earth
> - particles such as electrons, photons and neutrinos, less elementary,
> such as protons and neutrons (in which quarks and gluons are confined), or
> composite, such as atoms and atomic nuclei
> - the universe
>
> Here are my question and answer. Perhaps it’s good to know that I am not a
> scientist in physics. I am not a mathematician, nor a physicist, nor a
> cosmologist. My profession was teaching students who want to work in social
> welfare. I am very interested in human behavior and the human brain. So I
> tried to study human nature and wrote a book about this subject: *How to
> change our human behavior, about the biological factor in human behavior*.
> *See *http://www.human-DNA.org <http://www.human-dna.org/>   In general:
> my big interest is the human consciousness about space and time related to
> our individual experience of life.
>
>
> I add my question and answers in a separate Word document.
>
>
> If you still see some possibility to go on exchanging our ideas I will
> send you a link to my paper *"Mind-blowing Gravitation. Gravitation
> equals expansion."*
>
>
> I hope to hear from you again.
>
>
> PS: I did not understand this sentence you wrote: As for the expansion of
> the earth or the universe, it is out of my reasoning any expansion of the
> earth or the universe as per a given quantity of mass occupying a greater
> volume. Perhaps you can explain what you mean because it could be a
> resemblance with my concept or just the opposite. My statement would be
> that the expansion of the earth and the universe implies the occupation of
> a greater volume by a greater mass (m^3 per kg s^2) by converting energy in
> to mass.
>
>
> Best regards.
>
>
> Ruud Loeffen
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Stavros Tassos <s.tassos at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Ruud
>>
>> Thank you for your note and for taking the time to read my paper. Indeed
>> I do not have much time, but I am very much interested in your work.
>>
>> I am sending to you the essence of my work in the form of question and
>> answer, and I would like someting similar from your part, because I want
>> first to understand the physical meaning of any proposition, and then its
>> mathematical formulation.
>>
>> Question :
>> What is the response of a material continuum, i.e., a medium with mass
>> and without vacuum, thus being the depository of infinite mass and energy
>> (1/mass), which due to its mass content, i.e., inertia, has a limited and
>> constant-invariant speed, c, and which is absolutely elastic for speeds
>> lower or  equal than c, and absolutely rigid for speeds equal to c, thus
>> giving the physical meaning of space and time between cause and effect, and
>> which continuum, due to its infinite mass, is under constant
>> extension-attraction (gravity-G)?
>>
>> Answer :
>> 1.       The material continuum will deform linearly up to c, since it
>> is absolutely elastic up to c, and then it will start to write a perfect
>> cyclic trajectory, due to its absolute rigidity for speeds greater than c,
>> the extra energy being used for the change of direction of motion, and not
>> for the increase of its velocity, since its deformation rate cannot exceed
>> c. This is the cyclic-reversible component of motion, and cosmos is a
>> material continuum because otherwise, if it was made of of discrete
>> particles, it could not wave, and each wave, regardless of its length, is
>> the materialized infinity since it can be analyzed in an infinite number of
>> waves with higher frequency, and the rate of its extension (energy) to its
>> compaction (mass) is constant, according to E=mc2.
>> 2.       Since the now waving material continuum  continues to be under
>> constant stretching it will respond by waving at a higher frequency –
>> smaller radius of the cycle, thus increasing the mass and energy density,
>> according to E=hf, of a given space unit. That being the
>> unidirectional-irreversible, towards greater frequency-complexity,
>> evolutionary component of our dialectically material cosmos.
>>
>> As for the expansion of the earth or the universe, it is out of my
>> reasononing any expansion of the earth or the universe as per a given
>> quantity of mass occupying a greater volume.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Stavros
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, October 28, 2016 10:04 AM, Ruud Loeffen <rmmloeffen at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello Stavros.
>>
>> I read your message to Arend Lammerink about physics discussion and your
>> paper about the earth. Perhaps you are interested too in my paper
>> "Mind-blowing Gravitation. Gravitation equals expansion". Since you are
>> busy in politics I wonder if you have time to read it. I made a connection
>> with Lorentz Transformation of mass-energy, the Gravitational Constant and
>> expansion. Recently I made calculations what the expansion would mean per
>> atom. In your paper I found some very interesting connections.
>> So let me know if you are interested and have some time left. Then I will
>> give you the link to my paper. You can also read some discussion about it
>> on this physics form via the archive function: http://mail.tuks.nl/
>> pipermail/physics/2016-October /thread.html
>> <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/2016-October/thread.html> (by my
>> name Ruud Loeffen)
>>
>> I am very convinced that the earth is expanding. But I don't know if you
>> can agree that the acceleration of 9,8 m/s^2 also is the result of
>> expansion and can be the result of Lorent Transformation calculation of
>> energy-mass conversion.
>> [image: Inline image 2]
>>
>> *Ruud Loeffen*
>> Paardestraat32
>> 6131HC Sittard
>>
>>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Physics mailing list
Physics at tuks.nl
http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20161220/7f6db139/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 746820 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20161220/7f6db139/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 511666 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20161220/7f6db139/attachment-0001.png>