[Physics] "Real" time

[Doug Marett]

Hi James - glad you liked it - I did try running it inside a big Helmholtz
coil to cancel out the magnetic field at one point, and it didn't appear to
make a difference, probably because the Earth's magnetic field was about
160x smaller than the solenoid field I was using. But perhaps it would
behave differently at higher altitudes, I think it would have to be made
more sensitive for that because right now the voltages generated are tiny.

thanks for watching - Doug

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 12:45 PM, James Rose <integrity at prodigy.net> wrote:

> Doug,
>
> Fascinating experiments.  Question:  Have you -- or, Can you -- run the
> same experiments at different -altitudes-, to see if there is a difference
> in the values generated?
>
> I have a suspicion you will generate different values - because - you are
> generating effects of interaction with the earth's magnetic field, and the
> values generated will be different at alternative altitudes.  It would be
> fascinating to propose and run miniaturized sample runs inside the ISS,
> International Space Station as well.   Then aboard a 'stationary orbit"
> satellite, versus on the moon, versus at Legrange points.     (these later
> locations being for the future to run, :-)  )
>
> Jamie Rose
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Doug Marett <dm88dm at gmail.com>
> *To:* General Physics and Natural Philosophy discussion list <
> physics at tuks.nl>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 1, 2016 9:29 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Physics] "Real" time
>
> Thanks Ruud!
>
>     What is so interesting to me about it is that the research suggests
> that magnetic induction can occur without even the counter-movement of a
> magnet and a conductor, or even a changing magnetic field. Rather, all that
> is necessary is the rotation of a magnet/conductor together with respect to
> "the fixed stars". Again, it brings us back to the idea that an "absolute
> frame of reference" has a physical meaning.
>
> Doug
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Ruud Loeffen <rmmloeffen at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Doug.
>
> Congratulations to you. I hope you will gain recognition for your work.
> It's pretty difficult for me to understand, but it seems to me accurate and
> convincing. Good luck! Thumps up!👍
>
> Ruud Loeffen
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Doug Marett <dm88dm at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
>     Just wanted to share with you my latest research testing one of
> Einstein's ideas. This is the explanation of the Faraday Paradox / unipolar
> dynamo.
>  The just released Youtube video is here:
>
> https://youtu.be/c5wgmTGi5pU
>
> Seems that the evidence is in and there are some very strange things
> happening with magnetic induction! Check it out!
>
> The part 1 of the video is here, for context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?
> v=gduYoT9sMaE <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gduYoT9sMaE>
>
> Doug
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Ilja Schmelzer <
> ilja.schmelzer at googlemail.com > wrote:
>
> 2016-10-30 19:30 GMT+01:00, Thomas Goodey <thomas at flyingkettle.com>:
> > The above statements are not expressed in space-time terms.
>
> Indeed.  But this does not make them wrong.  I do not doubt that they
> can be translated into spacetime language, but see no advantage from
> this.  In fact, they become weaker in this way.
>
> >> Another important
> >> class is related with causality:  If event A has causally
> >> influenced event B, then when A has happened before B has
> >> happened.
>
> > This statement is also subject to the same clarification as
> > I have given above.
>
> With statements about causality the weakening becomes even more
> obvious.  As far as a translation of causal statements into spacetime
> language is possible at all, it has to be formulated in a language,
> which does not lead into contradictions if applied to solutions with
> causal loops, like the Goedel universe.
>
> So I doubt that "clarification" is the appropriate word here.
>
> ______________________________ _________________
> Physics mailing list
> Physics at tuks.nl
> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/ma ilman/listinfo/physics
> <http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics>
>
>
>
> ______________________________ _________________
> Physics mailing list
> Physics at tuks.nl
> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/ma ilman/listinfo/physics
> <http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics>
>
>
>
>
> --
> *Ruud Loeffen*
> Paardestraat32
> 6131HC Sittard
> http://www.human-DNA.org <http://www.human-dna.org/>
>
> ______________________________ _________________
> Physics mailing list
> Physics at tuks.nl
> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/ mailman/listinfo/physics
> <http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Physics mailing list
> Physics at tuks.nl
> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Physics mailing list
> Physics at tuks.nl
> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20161101/51eefd9e/attachment.html>