[Physics] Maxwell extension

Thu Oct 20 20:59:31 CEST 2016

Please read "The Hilbert Book Test Model"; http://vixra.org/abs/1603.0021
or docs.com/hans-van-leunen
Sincerely yours,
Hans
----Origineel Bericht----
Van : integrity at prodigy.net
Datum : 20/10/2016 12:29
Aan : physics at tuks.nl
Onderwerp : Re: [Physics] Maxwell extension

     Arend, 

     Apologies if this is redundant ... please reply with a link to your current~latest 'description of gravitation'.

     Thank you,

     Jamie Rose

      From: Arend Lammertink <lamare at gmail.com>

      To: arbab.ibrahim at gmail.com 

      Cc: General Physics and Natural Philosophy discussion list <physics at tuks.nl>

      Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 12:14 PM

      Subject: [Physics] Maxwell extension

            Hello Arbab,

           Thank you for your reply. I know Koen van Vlaenderen well. In fact, he was one of the first to criticize my original description of gravitation. 

          I've cc-ed the physics mailinglist, so your papers may be discussed.

         Best regards,

        Arend.

                Arend Lammertink, MScEE,

               Goor, The Netherlands.

              Please note that I'm currently overwhelmed with e-mails. If you're interested in discussing science and/or physics, please consider subscribing to the mailing list I created for that purpose:

              http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics

            On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Arbab I. Arbab 
            <arbab.ibrahim at gmail.com> wrote:

              Dear 
              Arend Lammertink,

               Thank you very much for your kind message. I really do agree that Maxwell equations are but not complete. Extension of Maxwell equations were met with rejection without reason. I have also made some publications in this regard. The first one appeared in 

               http://www.ptep-online.com/ index_files/2009/PP-17-03.PDF

                and

               http://cpb.iphy.ac.cn/fileup/ PDF/2013-3-030301.pdf

               In these papers I showed that the extension is inevitable
               . There is an engineer in the Netherlands who share the same ideas. His name is 
               Koen van Vlaenderen. I suggest if you are interested to organize an international 

               conference that deals with these shortcoming.

               Thank you and good luck.

               Arbab

                 On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Arend Lammertink 
                 <lamare at gmail.com> wrote:

                  Dear fellow dissident scientist,

 I have spent a lot of time analyzing the history of Maxwell's

 equations and how those led to Relativity as well as Quantum Field

 Theory. Based on that analysis, I found an astonishing inconsistency

 in Maxwell's equations, which led to an incomplete model for

 electromagnetics.

 For instance, Maxwell's equations predict only one type of

 electromagnetic waves to exist, namely transverse waves, while in

 actual fact at least two types of waves are known to exist, namely the

 "near" and "far" fields:

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Near_and_far_field

 By correcting this inconsistency, we can come to a Unified model in an

 elegant, consistent and natural way. Please find my abstract below.

 You can read the full article at my personal website:

                  http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index. php/Main/AnExceptionallyElegan tTheoryOfEverything

 I hope you are able and willing to consider my proposal and let me

 know what you think about it. To me, it contains the answer I believe

 science has been looking for, but of course you may differ in opinion.

 Kindest regards,

 Arend Lammertink, MScEE,

 Goor, The Netherlands.

 P.S. I found your email address at:

                  http://editionsassailly.com/li vres/climont%20full%20list%20h tm.htm

 ----

 Abstract

 In a previous article, we stated that all currently known areas of

 Physics' theories converge naturally into one Unified Theory of

 Everything once we make one fundamental change to Maxwell's aether

 model. In that article, we explored the history of Maxwell's equations

 and considered a number of reasons for the need to revise Maxwell's

 equations. In this article, we will make the mathematical case that

 there is a hole in Maxwell's equations which should not be there,

 given that we started with the same basic hypothesis as Maxwell did:

 A physical, fluid-like medium called "aether" exists.

 Maxwell did not explicitly use this underlying hypothesis, but

 abstracted it away. This leads to a mathematically inconsistent model

 wherein, for example, units of measurements do not match in his

 definition for the electric potential field. By correcting this

 obvious flaw in the model and extending it with a definition for the

 gravity field, we obtain a simple, elegant, complete and

 mathematically consistent "theory of everything" without "gauge

 freedom", the fundamental theoretical basis for Quantum Weirdness

 which we must therefore reject.

 [...]

 Conclusions

 By working out standard textbook fluid dynamic vector theory for an

 ideal, compressible, non-viscous Newtonian fluid, we have established

 that Maxwell's equations are mathematically inconsistent, given that

 these are supposed to describe the electromagnetic field from the

 aether hypothesis. Since our effort is a direct extension of Paul

 Stowe and Barry Mingst' aether model, we have come to a complete

 mathematically consistent "field theory of everything". And we found

 "Maxwell's hole" to be the original flaw in the standard model that

 led to both relativity and Quantum Mechanics, which should thus both

 be rejected.

 ----

              -- 

------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ---------------

                              A. I. Arbab, PhD, MInst.P., CPhys., FRAS

                               Professor,
Dept. of Physics, College  of Science, ِQassim University, KSA.
https://www.researchgate.net/ profile/Arbab_Arbab
http://staffpages.uofk.edu/ arbab-arbab/

                               http://www.livedna.net/?dna= 249.1286
Mobile: +966550790379

_______________________________________________

Physics mailing list

      Physics at tuks.nl

      http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20161020/35603eb2/attachment-0001.html>