[Physics] Maxwell extension

Thu Oct 20 12:29:22 CEST 2016

Arend, 

Apologies if this is redundant ... please reply with a link to your current~latest 'description of gravitation'.Thank you,
Jamie Rose

 From: Arend Lammertink <lamare at gmail.com>
 To: arbab.ibrahim at gmail.com 
Cc: General Physics and Natural Philosophy discussion list <physics at tuks.nl>
 Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 12:14 PM
 Subject: [Physics] Maxwell extension

Hello Arbab,

Thank you for your reply. I know Koen van Vlaenderen well. In fact, he was one of the first to criticize my original description of gravitation. 

I've cc-ed the physics mailinglist, so your papers may be discussed.

Best regards,

Arend.

Arend Lammertink, MScEE,
Goor, The Netherlands.

Please note that I'm currently overwhelmed with e-mails. If you're interested in discussing science and/or physics, please consider subscribing to the mailing list I created for that purpose:

http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics

On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Arbab I. Arbab <arbab.ibrahim at gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Arend Lammertink,Thank you very much for your kind message. I really do agree that Maxwell equations are but not complete. Extension of Maxwell equations were met with rejection without reason. I have also made some publications in this regard. The first one appeared in http://www.ptep-online.com/ index_files/2009/PP-17-03.PDF
 andhttp://cpb.iphy.ac.cn/fileup/ PDF/2013-3-030301.pdf

In these papers I showed that the extension is inevitable. There is an engineer in the Netherlands who share the same ideas. His name is Koen van Vlaenderen. I suggest if you are interested to organize an international conference that deals with these shortcoming.Thank you and good luck.Arbab
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Arend Lammertink <lamare at gmail.com> wrote:

Dear fellow dissident scientist,

I have spent a lot of time analyzing the history of Maxwell's
equations and how those led to Relativity as well as Quantum Field
Theory. Based on that analysis, I found an astonishing inconsistency
in Maxwell's equations, which led to an incomplete model for
electromagnetics.

For instance, Maxwell's equations predict only one type of
electromagnetic waves to exist, namely transverse waves, while in
actual fact at least two types of waves are known to exist, namely the
"near" and "far" fields:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Near_and_far_field

By correcting this inconsistency, we can come to a Unified model in an
elegant, consistent and natural way. Please find my abstract below.

You can read the full article at my personal website:

http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index. php/Main/AnExceptionallyElegan tTheoryOfEverything

I hope you are able and willing to consider my proposal and let me
know what you think about it. To me, it contains the answer I believe
science has been looking for, but of course you may differ in opinion.

Kindest regards,

Arend Lammertink, MScEE,
Goor, The Netherlands.

P.S. I found your email address at:
http://editionsassailly.com/li vres/climont%20full%20list%20h tm.htm

----

Abstract

In a previous article, we stated that all currently known areas of
Physics' theories converge naturally into one Unified Theory of
Everything once we make one fundamental change to Maxwell's aether
model. In that article, we explored the history of Maxwell's equations
and considered a number of reasons for the need to revise Maxwell's
equations. In this article, we will make the mathematical case that
there is a hole in Maxwell's equations which should not be there,
given that we started with the same basic hypothesis as Maxwell did:

A physical, fluid-like medium called "aether" exists.

Maxwell did not explicitly use this underlying hypothesis, but
abstracted it away. This leads to a mathematically inconsistent model
wherein, for example, units of measurements do not match in his
definition for the electric potential field. By correcting this
obvious flaw in the model and extending it with a definition for the
gravity field, we obtain a simple, elegant, complete and
mathematically consistent "theory of everything" without "gauge
freedom", the fundamental theoretical basis for Quantum Weirdness
which we must therefore reject.

[...]

Conclusions

By working out standard textbook fluid dynamic vector theory for an
ideal, compressible, non-viscous Newtonian fluid, we have established
that Maxwell's equations are mathematically inconsistent, given that
these are supposed to describe the electromagnetic field from the
aether hypothesis. Since our effort is a direct extension of Paul
Stowe and Barry Mingst' aether model, we have come to a complete
mathematically consistent "field theory of everything". And we found
"Maxwell's hole" to be the original flaw in the standard model that
led to both relativity and Quantum Mechanics, which should thus both
be rejected.

----

-- 

------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ---------------
A. I. Arbab, PhD, MInst.P., CPhys., FRASProfessor,
Dept. of Physics, College  of Science, ِQassim University, KSA.
https://www.researchgate.net/ profile/Arbab_Arbab
http://staffpages.uofk.edu/ arbab-arbab/http://www.livedna.net/?dna= 249.1286
Mobile: +966550790379

_______________________________________________
Physics mailing list
Physics at tuks.nl
http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20161020/e3b520c3/attachment.html>