[Physics] Ring Theory update and progress for discussion

[carmam at tiscali.co.uk]

Hi Mike, you asked if your ideas are considered comment worthy. I will need a little more time to properly digest your email, but one point did stick out.You wrote :- "Another anomaly explained is that without G, gravitational and inertial mass are equivalent."I have written a web page :-  http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/carmam/Hollings.html  in which, in section 5 , by a logical argument in a thought experiment, I have proved that the equivalence principle is wrong, and it has far reaching consequences (to go straight to section 5, append #gravity to the address).

Tom Hollings

----Original Message----

From: mike at mlawrence.co.uk

Date: 21/10/2016 12:58

To: <physics at tuks.nl>

Subj: [Physics] Ring Theory update and progress for discussion










-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20161021/ed68df8a/attachment.html>