[Physics] Start up Task Force Gravitation group
Norm Silliman
silliman at mindsync.com
Mon Jan 16 19:24:06 CET 2017
Hans van Leunen,
Thank you for the observation (and for the pun). If the Gravity
Model (part of Physics), needs to be done
with multidimensional differential calculus, why has a 100 years gone by
and the multidimensional differential
calculus people (there is estimated 1000's of them) failed to do the
job. And they didn't even get shamed for
failing.
Best Regards,
Norm
On 1/16/2017 4:26 AM, Hans van Leunen wrote:
> Norman Silliman,
> You have silly thoughts. If there is one part of physics that cannot
> do with proper mathematical models, then it is gravity and especially
> inertia.
> So if you want to dive into that subject then you better learn enough
> about multidimensional differential calculus. If you do not want to do
> that, then you better select a different hobby because with gravity
> without math you can only make a fool of yourself.
> Sincerely yours,
> Hans van Leunen,
> docs.com/hans-van-leunen
>
> ----Origineel Bericht----
> Van : silliman at mindsync.com
> Datum : 16/01/2017 00:04
> Aan : physics at tuks.nl
> Onderwerp : Re: [Physics] Start up Task Force Gravitation group
>
> To Mr Abbas, Serret and Loeffen,
>
> I am interested in participating in this topic of gravity. I
> bring a group of experimental evidence that
> I find useful for me to narrow down the possibilities of what
> 'Gravity is' and how 'Gravity works'.
> BUT I come to you with grave doubts in the utility of Mathematics
> to build theoretical models.
>
> And since gravity 'looks' exactly like rocket acceleration
> and centrifuge acceleration, the topic of gravity
> may bleed off into references of 'forces'.
>
> Norman Silliman
>
> On 1/15/2017 6:18 AM, Ruud Loeffen wrote:
>
> Dear colleagues.
>
> As announced earlier in my Email October 23 2016 I want to
> join forces on the topic of gravitation. I got confirmation
> from 3 members. So, we are ready to start.
>
> We:
>
> *Tufail Abbas:*Writer of Big Bathroom Universe- The universe
> is made of an stationary cubic lattice structure through which
> space and time moves, resulting into all matter and energy
> that we see. By developing this framework of cubic lattice
> structure it has been envisioned that it would possible to
> express all physical properties (i.e. space, time, energy,
> charge, momentum, temperature, velocity, force etc.) in terms
> of the geometric parameters (i.e. length, surface area,
> volume, angle, orientation, cycles) of the base structure. The
> force of gravity or any other force is caused due to movement
> of space through mass (or charge) to extra dimensions which is
> apparently observed as the state of rest in our optically
> visible dimensions.
> *Olivier Serret:*engineer, holds up a neo-Newtonian approach:
> basically, it is the Newtonian mechanics, except than
> gravitational mass is different from the inertial mass. It
> allows to demonstrate the Lorentz factorγ, a new rule for the
> velocities addition, the synchrotron radiation and the
> perihelion precession of
> Mercury(/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3xZ5r1hi9s//). /The
> interest of this theory is to be in coherence withthe
> universal time of the Quantum Mechanics (and of course of the
> Newtonian mechanics).
> *Stavros Tassos:*Writer of the Excess Mass Stress Tectonics -
> EMST model, whereby the waving at light speed c=299792458 m/s
> and under constant stretching space is the infinite source of
> all mass. Energy and matter are sine waveforms of local
> anisotropy in the elastic, large-scale isotropic continuum,
> which is lossless and has infinite elasticity to any velocity
> lower than c, and infinite rigidity to any velocity equal or
> greater than c. Earth's inner core is an equilibrium high
> tension-frequency location, wherein energy - unpaired standing
> or travelling waves transform into matter - paired standing
> waves which are added, in a solid-state, atom-by-atom around
> the core.*//*
>
> *Ruud Loeffen:*The central question of my studies has always
> been “How does the human mind perceive the surrounding world
> and regulate the interaction between human beings and the
> environment?” Another item I studied is gravitation and
> cosmology, writing a booklet about this: "Mind-blowing
> Gravitation. Gravitation equals expansion" to demonstrate the
> possibility that the Lorentz transformation of mass-energy
> could play a key role in expansion of matter. To gain
> cooperation on the topic of Gravitation I support this start
> up on Gravitation.
>
> *
> *
>
> *Our purpose:*
>
> 1.We will form a *“Task Force Gravitation” *with 4 – 7 members
> with a widespread range of sciences. Members of this Task
> Force are willing to*share their criticism**about the current
> explanations of Gravitation**, and exchange their ideas,
> equations and calculationsabout Gravitation**. Members also
> must be willing to let lose the own theory*. (period: January
> 16 - February 1)
>
> 2.We will prepare a document *“Startup Gravitation”* that
> should provide a brief overview of status regarding
> understanding of gravity and the proposed way forward. We will
> try to create a new paper. Probably we need some elements of
> different theories to put together. Some parts to combine,
> some parts to throw away, some parts to change. (period
> February 1 - April 1)
>
> 3.We will write a document *“Foundation for gravitation”. *
> It's about macro objects and elementary particles, radiation,
> waves and the aether field. Macro and micro should connect as
> gravity starts at the center of the nucleus and extends to
> farthest region of the Universe. Most important aim is to find
> *irrefutable evidence* for this theory that gives solid base
> and is understandable for laymen and journalists.(period April
> 1 - December 1)
>
> We welcome somebody with knowledge of following mathematical
> stuff as related to physics: Vector Algebra, Riemann Geometry,
> Complex Numbers, Various derivations of Pi, Circumference of
> Ellipse, Zeta Function, Hilbert Spaces.
>
> possible connections with theories of other members:
>
> a)Constant length of photon and transformation from Euclidean
> to space-time format; Hans van Leunen
>
> b)acceleration and gravitation; Mike Lawrence
>
> c)aether and field; vortex phenomena Arend Lammertink
>
> We will welcome members who want to join this Task Force.
> Please pay attention to point 1: "Members also must be willing
> to let lose the own theory”.
>
>
> From January 16 - February 1 we aim to make our group definitive.
> In the next step *“Startup Gravitation” * (period February 1 -
> April 1) I will make a list of questions for step 2, that the
> members can edit also. To continue to step 3 (the document) we
> will make an outline for the document with all relevant
> chapters and especially we will try to find *irrefutable
> evidence* for this theory that gives solid base and is
> understandable for laymen and journalists. (period April 1 -
> December 15).
>
> If we want to change the steps 1 -3 or to change the periods,
> we can do also. For every step members of the TFG are invited
> to help determine the outlines.
>
>
> --
> *Ruud Loeffen on behalf of Tufail Abbas, Olivier Serret,
> Stavros Tassos.*
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Physics mailing list
> Physics at tuks.nlhttp://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Physics mailing list
> Physics at tuks.nl
> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20170116/3e4d576a/attachment.html>
More information about the Physics
mailing list