[Physics] Constant light speed

mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk
Mon Jun 12 16:58:56 CEST 2017


Ilja and all,

I have detailed in the past answers to all the recent issues being 
raised on mass, force, light speed, gravity, aether etc. I won't go over 
in detail, other than to say that the maximum speed of anything 
(including light) when travelling within the background (like a diffuse 
aether) is what we call light speed. But that speed varies from zero 
(near a black hole) to 3.x x10^8 m/s away from large masses. When there 
is no background, there is no maximum speed. This difference is due to 
the presence or absence of viscosity. Within the background there is 
viscosity. Outside the background there is no viscosity. Within the 
background there is relativistic motion. Outside there is quantum 
mechanics.

The background is both nothing and something. It is pairs of particle 
and anti-particle partly or wholly merged and vibrating, rotating or 
translating. When such a pair is fully merged, there is no force 
observable from the pair because their properties (mass and charge of 
equal size and strength) cancel exactly. Where they are partially 
merged, there are electric and gravitational fields.

The reason light speed is not a constant (apart from the basic size 
effects of the local background on photons) is because velocity is not a 
constant like h. It has powers of two in terms of the basic parameter Y. 
Both h and G have powers of zero, as they must to be constants, but G 
can be eliminated by substitution into the size of Planck mass, radius 
and charge (even though G is not charge-related).

WHy we see gravity is not due to mass, but the effect of the rotation of 
loops which contain equal numbers of the same particle/anti-particle 
pairs as make up the background. The loops affect the background and 
look like there is a mass present.

Apologies for being so long winded, which I had not intended. The two 
papers which I already mentioned and which explain all these things in 
far more detail are:

The two papers mentioned have the following hyperlinks:

http://www.omicsonline.com/open-access/a-viscosity-hypothesis-that-the-presence-or-absence-of-viscosityseparates-relativistic-and-quantum-systems-based-on-the-simplestp-2090-0902-1000200.php?aid=80828

and

https://www.omicsonline.com/open-access/how-si-units-hide-the-equal-strength-of-gravitation-and-charge-fields-2090-0902-1000151.php?aid=68275

Cheers
Mike



On 2017-06-12 08:26, Ilja Schmelzer wrote:
> I have written some introduction to SR focussing on the Lorentz ether 
> too, see
> http://ilja-schmelzer.de/ether/introduction.php   To say there
> something about "constancy of speed of light" is not even necessary.
> Try it out, comments welcome.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Physics mailing list
> Physics at tuks.nl
> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics




More information about the Physics mailing list