[Physics] Milky way black hole missing?

[Tom Hollings]

Doug, I often watch Dr. Robitaille, usually linked to a Stephen Crothers video. This is the first time I have heard (serious) mention of a solid sun. 

Tom.

> On 18 February 2019 at 17:32 Doug Marett <dm88dm at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>         Hi Tom,
> 
>             Thanks for the links - I can see the thunderbolts article disputes the idea that a sun can compress to a point. Have you seen Dr. Robitaille's video's (Sky Scholar) regarding the structure of the sun and how he believes it can't be compressed into a black hole?  An example is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxEokSd-o5o 
>         Interestingly, the author Alexander Unzicker (Bankrupting Physics) has come out in support of Robitaille's ideas about the sun, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w21K4KiYd4I
>             These ideas seem to fit with the gravitational redshift discussion that we had here back in December, except coming at the GR critique from a different angle.
> 
>     Doug
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:52 AM Tom Hollings < carmam at tiscali.co.uk mailto:carmam at tiscali.co.uk > wrote:
> 
>         > > 
> >         Doug, I have my doubts about black holes because all of the phenomena associated with them can be explained by classical physics - for an example see here :-   http://thunderbolts.info/tpod/2010/arch10/100302stretch.htm .
> > 
> >         I am presently reading the article which you linked.
> > 
> >         Personally, I don't think that Sagittarius A* is a BH because BHs are a mathematical artifact only. For a good explanation go to :-  http://alternativephysics.org/book/GeneralRelativity.htm and scroll down to "The Black Hole conundrum". That and the next two chapters make for good reading.
> > 
> >         Tom Hollings
> > 
> > 
> >             > > > 
> > >             Hi Tom,
> > > 
> > >                  Similar doubt was expressed in this article: https://dailygalaxy.com/2018/10/the-milky-ways-central-supermassive-black-hole-is-a-mirage-it-doesnt-exist/
> > >             which is where I first heard of the Event Horizon Telescope project - they seemed to imply the results would be available in Dec. 2018. Chapline's alternative idea seems even stranger though - dark energy stars.
> > >             Doug
> > > 
> > >              
> > >             in/mailman/listinfo/physics
> > > 
> > >         > > 
> >     > 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20190218/5dff4b97/attachment.html>