[Physics] Splitting the Gravitational Constant

mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk
Wed Nov 20 19:42:34 CET 2019


Ruud,

Thanks for your email. Some of my further work showed that it is more 
useful to keep h, even though it is a dimensionless number, because it 
helps to keep sizes relative to observations better.

So to give numbers to Earth’s gravity, best to use DAPU (double-adjusted 
Planck units). But the reason for gravity in either current SI or DAPU 
is the same – the effective depression of space time. I don’t want to 
jump into the full explanation of gravity here (I will give the 
hyperlink below) because it needs to be understood in logical steps.

But put simply, the myriad merged particle/anti-particle ‘meons’ that 
make up the universe become unmerged, form chains with other such pairs 
– each positive chasing a negative chasing a positive etc until the 
chains latch onto their own tails to form loops. Loops with three such 
pairs are our fermions. Loops with other than three pairs are dark 
matter. The merged pairs are the ‘background’ across which all 
relativistic motion occurs.

The particles and anti-particles – the only real objects in the universe 
- have only properties of fundamental charge and mass. When they 
unmerge, each spins (not the usual spin ½ h) to generate one-sixth the 
electron charge, either positive or negative, with the total generated 
always zero.

In the fundamental particles, the chains, the loops and all combinations 
of loops like nucleons, the total of all energies present is always 
zero. How loops interact depends on how much of each type of mass and 
charge energy, and in what form, they each have.

Specifically the mass energy of positive meons in a loop will be exactly 
the same size and opposite sign to the mass energy of the negative meons 
in that loop. So all loops have total fundamental mass energy of zero. 
But the loop still has a frequency of rotation and a physical size. It 
is the effect of, firstly, the physical size of the loop and, secondly, 
the action of other nearby loops and the background merged pairs that 
act as if they are being deflected by space time.  I think of the loop 
as floating on the background, with the defection dependent on the area 
of the loop- larger mass loops have higher frequencies of rotation and 
thus smaller areas, so ‘sink’ further.
So that is my explanation of gravity, and the sum total of all the loops 
that make up the Earth gives the acceleration at the surface.

The latest paper I have had published explains the above and more, 
although it is structured more as list of hypotheses that need to be 
understood in order to see how the whole picture. It is like taking the 
current interpretations of much of physics as a jigsaw where pieces have 
been wrongly forced in place and showing that the pieces fit better in 
different places and the result is a different picture – although with 
all the observations retained.

The hyperlink is www.everythingexplained.co.uk/Hypothetical Pre-Fermion 
TOE in 95 Theses M Lawrence.pdf

Hope it helps you.

Cheers

Mike



On 2019-11-19 09:10, Ruud Loeffen wrote:
> Dear Mike.
> 
> Thanks for sending me your paper-link. I read through your document.
> It's very interesting. It's important to try to find the fundament of
> the units and the constants in physics.
> 
> My approach is  different from yours. I am not a physicist and not a
> mathematician. I just want to know "Why the stone is falling" In your
> paper I saw some remarks, that I recognize. As this one: _"To
> correctly understand the relationships between properties the
> fundamental constant G needs to be split equally between both mass and
> distance properties and h equally between both mass and charge
> properties on the one hand and distance on the other "_
> Sure, your approach is different and on a very more fundamental level.
> However, there may be some interesting connections on a less basic
> level. I would like to know from you how you would explain the 9.81
> m/s^2 acceleration at the surface of the earth. HOW WOULD YOUR
> EQUATION LOOK LIKE WITH THE BREAKDOWN OF THE UNITS? I think there must
> be some connection. I would also like to know: Do you have some
> insights or hypothesis related to the physical reality that we
> experience every day? There must be a physical reality built up from
> the fundamental dimensionless parameters that you proposed? If you
> have such a paper or if you have some ideas about that, I would like
> to hear.
> 
> I hope you will read through my book and if you see connections,
> please let me know.
> 
> Best regards.
> Ruud Loeffen.
> 
> Op di 19 nov. 2019 om 06:58 schreef <mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk>:
> 
>> Ruud,
>> 
>> Apologies, hyperlink should be
>> 
>> 
> https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/how-si-units-hide-the-equal-strength-of-gravitation-and-charge-fields-2090-0902-1000151.pdf
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Mike
>> 
>> On 2019-11-16 08:32, Ruud Loeffen wrote:
>>> Dear members of physics-list.
>>> 
>>> Now I have split the Gravitational Constant in two parts: One with
>> c2
>>> and one with included kappa. In my paper  Around KAPPA Word file
>> [1]
>>> I related the motions of planets to the Kinetic Energy of the
>>> semi-closed system of our solar system.
>>> It could be true that the measured acceleration at 9.8 m/s^2 at
>> the
>>> earth’s surface is a combination of two factors:
>>> 
>>> A: The downstream energy that flows from outside the mass to the
>>> center of the mass (electron, nucleus, planet, star).
>>> 
>>> B: The tiny upward movement of the surface area that expands
>> because
>>> mass is increasing by the conversion of energy to mass (causing
>> the
>>> drift of continents and the "ring of fire").
>>> 
>>> We can calculate the falling stone with this formula:
>>> 
>>> If you want you can download my book for free:
>>> CON-FUSING GRAVITATION. APPLYING THE LORENTZ TRANSFORMATION OF
>>> MASS-ENERGY NOVEMBER 2019 [2]
>>> http://bit.ly/2CFGDIh [2]
>>> 
>>> Best regards.
>>> 
>>> RUUD LOEFFEN
>>> http://www.human-DNA.org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Links:
>>> ------
>>> [1] http://bit.ly/2CUuyOo
>>> [2] http://bit.ly/2CFGDIh
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Physics mailing list
>>> Physics at tuks.nl
>>> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
> 
> --
> 
> RUUD LOEFFEN
> http://www.human-DNA.org




More information about the Physics mailing list