[Physics] Splitting the Gravitational Constant

[mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk]

Ruud,

Thanks for the reply. Sure, I wouldbe happy for you to add my stuff to 
your list. In response to your question on gravity, here is what I think 
you are asking for....

Force at surface  = mg = GmM/r^2

Where (SI units)

m = mass of any object in kg
g = acceleration at surface in ms^-2
M = mass of Earth in kg = 5.9722×10^24 kg
G = 6.67430x10−11 m^3⋅kg^−1⋅s^−2
r = radius of Earth from surface in metres  =  6.3781×10^6 m

So 	g = 6.67430x10−11 *  5.9722×10^24/( 6.3781×10^6)^2  = 9.798 ms^-2

Check of powers
mg = Y^1 * Y^7 = Y^8 = force = GmM/r^2 = Y^0 Y^1 Y^1/(Y^-3)^2 = Y^8

In DAPU units the equation is now

Force at surface  = mg = mM/r^2    (Note – No G)

m = mass of any object in DAPU mass units
g = acceleration at surface in DAPU acceleration units
M = mass of Earth in DAPU mass units  = 4.879×10^19 DAPUMU
G = not needed
r = radius of Earth from surface in DAPU length units  =  7.8071×10^11 
DAPULU

So 	g = 4.879×10^19 /( 7.8071×10^11)^2  =  8.0048x10^-5 DAPUAU

The DAPU/SI relationship is A(SI)/A(DAPU) = G^-0.5 so that
g (SI) = g(DAPU) * G^-0.5 = 8.0048x10^-5 / 8.169639x10^-6 = 9.798 ms^-2

When using DAPU units there is never any need to use G.

Hope that helps.

Cheers
Mike


On 2019-11-21 04:28, Ruud Loeffen wrote:
> Hello Mike.
> 
> I read through your "Hypothetical Pre-Fermion TOE in 95 Theses M
> Lawrence.pdf ". (
> http://www.everythingexplained.co.uk/Hypothetical%20Pre-Fermion%20TOE%20in%2095%20Theses%20M%20Lawrence.pdf
> )
> I can see that you built up a theoretical world of _"myriad of the two
> fundamental particles, a pair of positive and negative „meons‟,
> which when merged form a zero mass black hole (ZMBH)"_. It's
> interesting and this may present an important view on the emergence of
> mass. There are some other theories that may be compared to your
> approach. Also in my "Con-Fusing Gravitation" I listed a few theories
> that depart from emergence of matter from elementary particles on the
> _"background of the universe that produces a viscosity against which
> all composite particles"_ arise.(chapter 5. The inflow of energy). If
> you would agree to be listed there too, let me know. I can add your
> book with the link.
> 
> However. I would like to know if you can present an equation similar
> to this one, that can be used to calculate the acceleration at the
> surface of a planet (but then based on your theory). How would your
> equation look?
> 
> These are from chapter 3. 3. THE FALLING STONE. SPLITTING THE
> GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANT.
> 
> I hope to hear from ou again.
> 
> Best regards.
> Ruud Loeffen.
> 
> Op do 21 nov. 2019 om 01:42 schreef <mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk>:
> 
>> Ruud,
>> 
>> Thanks for your email. Some of my further work showed that it is
>> more
>> useful to keep h, even though it is a dimensionless number, because
>> it
>> helps to keep sizes relative to observations better.
>> 
>> So to give numbers to Earth’s gravity, best to use DAPU
>> (double-adjusted
>> Planck units). But the reason for gravity in either current SI or
>> DAPU
>> is the same – the effective depression of space time. I don’t
>> want to
>> jump into the full explanation of gravity here (I will give the
>> hyperlink below) because it needs to be understood in logical steps.
>> 
>> But put simply, the myriad merged particle/anti-particle ‘meons’
>> that
>> make up the universe become unmerged, form chains with other such
>> pairs
>> – each positive chasing a negative chasing a positive etc until
>> the
>> chains latch onto their own tails to form loops. Loops with three
>> such
>> pairs are our fermions. Loops with other than three pairs are dark
>> matter. The merged pairs are the ‘background’ across which all
>> relativistic motion occurs.
>> 
>> The particles and anti-particles – the only real objects in the
>> universe
>> - have only properties of fundamental charge and mass. When they
>> unmerge, each spins (not the usual spin ½ h) to generate one-sixth
>> the
>> electron charge, either positive or negative, with the total
>> generated
>> always zero.
>> 
>> In the fundamental particles, the chains, the loops and all
>> combinations
>> of loops like nucleons, the total of all energies present is always
>> zero. How loops interact depends on how much of each type of mass
>> and
>> charge energy, and in what form, they each have.
>> 
>> Specifically the mass energy of positive meons in a loop will be
>> exactly
>> the same size and opposite sign to the mass energy of the negative
>> meons
>> in that loop. So all loops have total fundamental mass energy of
>> zero.
>> But the loop still has a frequency of rotation and a physical size.
>> It
>> is the effect of, firstly, the physical size of the loop and,
>> secondly,
>> the action of other nearby loops and the background merged pairs
>> that
>> act as if they are being deflected by space time.  I think of the
>> loop
>> as floating on the background, with the defection dependent on the
>> area
>> of the loop- larger mass loops have higher frequencies of rotation
>> and
>> thus smaller areas, so ‘sink’ further.
>> So that is my explanation of gravity, and the sum total of all the
>> loops
>> that make up the Earth gives the acceleration at the surface.
>> 
>> The latest paper I have had published explains the above and more,
>> although it is structured more as list of hypotheses that need to be
>> 
>> understood in order to see how the whole picture. It is like taking
>> the
>> current interpretations of much of physics as a jigsaw where pieces
>> have
>> been wrongly forced in place and showing that the pieces fit better
>> in
>> different places and the result is a different picture – although
>> with
>> all the observations retained.
>> 
>> The hyperlink is www.everythingexplained.co.uk/Hypothetical [1]
>> Pre-Fermion
>> TOE in 95 Theses M Lawrence.pdf
>> 
>> Hope it helps you.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> Mike
>> 
>> On 2019-11-19 09:10, Ruud Loeffen wrote:
>>> Dear Mike.
>>> 
>>> Thanks for sending me your paper-link. I read through your
>> document.
>>> It's very interesting. It's important to try to find the fundament
>> of
>>> the units and the constants in physics.
>>> 
>>> My approach is  different from yours. I am not a physicist and not
>> a
>>> mathematician. I just want to know "Why the stone is falling" In
>> your
>>> paper I saw some remarks, that I recognize. As this one: _"To
>>> correctly understand the relationships between properties the
>>> fundamental constant G needs to be split equally between both mass
>> and
>>> distance properties and h equally between both mass and charge
>>> properties on the one hand and distance on the other "_
>>> Sure, your approach is different and on a very more fundamental
>> level.
>>> However, there may be some interesting connections on a less basic
>>> level. I would like to know from you how you would explain the
>> 9.81
>>> m/s^2 acceleration at the surface of the earth. HOW WOULD YOUR
>>> EQUATION LOOK LIKE WITH THE BREAKDOWN OF THE UNITS? I think there
>> must
>>> be some connection. I would also like to know: Do you have some
>>> insights or hypothesis related to the physical reality that we
>>> experience every day? There must be a physical reality built up
>> from
>>> the fundamental dimensionless parameters that you proposed? If you
>>> have such a paper or if you have some ideas about that, I would
>> like
>>> to hear.
>>> 
>>> I hope you will read through my book and if you see connections,
>>> please let me know.
>>> 
>>> Best regards.
>>> Ruud Loeffen.
>>> 
>>> Op di 19 nov. 2019 om 06:58 schreef <mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk>:
>>> 
>>>> Ruud,
>>>> 
>>>> Apologies, hyperlink should be
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/how-si-units-hide-the-equal-strength-of-gravitation-and-charge-fields-2090-0902-1000151.pdf
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Mike
>>>> 
>>>> On 2019-11-16 08:32, Ruud Loeffen wrote:
>>>>> Dear members of physics-list.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Now I have split the Gravitational Constant in two parts: One
>> with
>>>> c2
>>>>> and one with included kappa. In my paper  Around KAPPA Word file
>>>> [1]
>>>>> I related the motions of planets to the Kinetic Energy of the
>>>>> semi-closed system of our solar system.
>>>>> It could be true that the measured acceleration at 9.8 m/s^2 at
>>>> the
>>>>> earth’s surface is a combination of two factors:
>>>>> 
>>>>> A: The downstream energy that flows from outside the mass to the
>>>>> center of the mass (electron, nucleus, planet, star).
>>>>> 
>>>>> B: The tiny upward movement of the surface area that expands
>>>> because
>>>>> mass is increasing by the conversion of energy to mass (causing
>>>> the
>>>>> drift of continents and the "ring of fire").
>>>>> 
>>>>> We can calculate the falling stone with this formula:
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you want you can download my book for free:
>>>>> CON-FUSING GRAVITATION. APPLYING THE LORENTZ TRANSFORMATION OF
>>>>> MASS-ENERGY NOVEMBER 2019 [2]
>>>>> http://bit.ly/2CFGDIh [2]
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best regards.
>>>>> 
>>>>> RUUD LOEFFEN
>>>>> http://www.human-DNA.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] http://www.everythingexplained.co.uk/Hypothetical