[Physics] Fwd: Gravity, CMB and use of wiki page.

Wed Apr 29 05:44:58 CEST 2020

Hello Arend.

My papers were once characterized by Carl Johnson as being
“Kindergarten-talk”. Since you mentioned that once there was *a child* that
shouted ”The emperor does not wear any clothes”, I am not bothering about
the classification Kindergarten-talk. However, the more I know, I know, I
know less. Knowledge.

Anyway: I am not a physicist, and not a mathematician. So, it might be
difficult to understand me 😉.

You wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 6:28 AM to Ruud Loeffen

“There are these gaps, like where the heck did he get that
3kT formula? and others like it, but at the end of the day it's the
(fundamental) ideas that matter most, math and references can (and
will eventually) be corrected.”

I was triggered by your question
*“where the heck did he get that 3kT formula”. *("He" is Paul Stowe)

I used this parameter “3kT” also in a formula that I found on:
*Maxwell-Bolzmann
distribution mean square speed*
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%E2%80%93Boltzmann_distribution#Typical_speeds>
from
where I used the equation to calculate the Root Mean square velocity of a
primordial elementary particle in CMB
[image: image.png]

[image: image.png]

K being the Boltzmann constant (I used kB in equation 312) and T is the
Temperature of the Microwave Background ( I used Tcmb) and for “m” I used
mep: mass of a primordial particle.

*( **https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background*
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background> * )*

[image: image.png]

I calculated this on advice of my colleague Tufail Abbas. We were really
shocked to find that the mass we found was indeed of a magnitude close to
an electron. This velocity Vcmb is the same as the Vrms 12.278 km/sec that
we  find in our solar system and the VRMS 12.278 km/sec being the proposed
Universal Root Mean Square Velocity.  The value of the mass of this
elementary particle mep is (deliberately) proposed as 7.4868348523E-31 kg.
This is remarkably close to the estimated value of the Mass of an electron:
9.1091E-31kg. It’s a little bit less in weight than an electron (as might
be expected for a PRIMORDIAL elementary particle).

I found some support in this paper:
http://sci.esa.int/planck/61396-planck-finds-no-new-evidence-for-cosmic-anomalies/

This paper was specifically interesting for me because of this phrase (see
my bolded indication):

*“....**the Planck team looked at the polarisation of the CMB, which was
revealed after a painstaking analysis of the multi-frequency data designed
to eliminate foreground sources of microwave emission, including gas and
dust in our own Milky Way galaxy. This signal is the best measurement to
date of the so-called CMB polarisation E-modes, and dates back to the time
when the first atoms formed in the Universe and the CMB was released. It is
produced by the way light scattered off electron particles just before the
electrons were gathered into hydrogen atoms**”.*

This primordial elementary particle would have an energy of 6.728*10^-14
Joules and 4.199*10^5 eV Just say: 4.2*10^5 eV

I describe this in “Prediction4: Velocity of  Cosmic Microwave Background”
in *CON-FUSING GRAVITATION. Applying the Lorentz Transformation of
Mass-Energy* <http://bit.ly/2CFGDIh> http://bit.ly/2CFGDIh
I attach the book as a .PDF in which its more easy to search and scroll
down.

I strongly advice real physicists NOT to read my book (it will be
embarrassing).

Some weeks ago, I posted on Physicslist my recently produced You Tube
video’s. I did not get any reaction from the list. One of the video’s is
about the VRMS: *A primordial velocity. The VRMS of a semi closed system*
<http://bit.ly/2U5xOzb> http://bit.ly/2U5xOzb

Perhaps I have to shout more loudly. Or keep my mouth shut.

Arend, I support your idea about the group discussion tool (peer review
process). I found a nice group on academia.edu where we exchange ideas in a
friendly way to cooperate and try to find progress. I probably would join
your peer review process. IT IS possible to exchange ideas in a way to make
progress by sharing and collaborating.

Best regards.

Ruud Loeffen
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Arend Lammertink <lamare at gmail.com>
Date: di 28 apr. 2020 20:04
Subject: [Physics] Gravity, CMB and use of wiki page.
To: General Physics and Natural Philosophy discussion list <physics at tuks.nl>
Cc: Paul Stowe <paul.stowe at sbcglobal.net>

Hi Ruud,

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 6:28 AM Ruud Loeffen <rmmloeffen at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Arend.
>
> You wrote:
> "Since it is an extention of Stowe's work, it predicts that the
> elementary particle called electron can be modeled as a single vortex
> ring which results in an actual understanding of "the quanta" as well
> as an actual understanding of what "charge" is. It also predicts that
> the observed cosmic background radiation, resulting in a minimum
> temperature of about 2.7 K, is related to the characteristic
> oscillation frequency of the electron".
> Can you (or Paul Stowe)present a link to a paper where this is explained?
I am especially interested in "It also predicts that
> the observed cosmic background radiation, resulting in a minimum
> temperature of about 2.7 K, is related to the characteristic
> oscillation frequency of the electron".
>
> I also have a calculation in my book "Con-fusing Gravitation" about the
relation between the temperature of CMBR (2.726 K) and a primordial
elementary particle. I would like to read Paul Stowes pape about this
subject.
>

Stowe is sometimes a bit hard to read, but here it is (same answer as to
Tom):

https://vixra.org/abs/1310.0237

See attached image for relevant part.

Problem I had is that I couldn't find the 3kT anywhere, but I
eventually found this, as I wrote to Paul a while ago:

"I also found a rather interesting paper regarding black body
radiation in relation to aether theory:

http://www.etherphysics.net/CKT1.pdf

"It is shown that Planck’s energy distribution for a black-body
radiation field can be simply derived for a gas-like ether with
Maxwellian statistics. The gas consists of an infinite variety of
particles, whose masses are integral multiples n of the mass of the
unit particle, the abundance of n-particles being proportional to
n^−4. The frequency of electromagnetic waves correlates with the
energy per unit mass of the particles, not with their energy, thus
differing from Planck’s quantum hypothesis. Identifying the special
wave-speed, usually called the speed of light, with the wave-speed in
the 2.7oK background radiation field, leads to a mass 1/2 × 10−39(kg)
for the unit ether-particle, and an average number of about 360 ether
particles per cubic centimetre in the background radiation field,
whose density is about 0.2 ×10−30(kg)/m3."

I find the number of 360 ether particles per cubic centimetre hard to
believe, so there may be errors in there. Either way, it also uses the
E=3kT and explains that this is because there are 6 degrees of
freedom, while your h(nu)=3kT comes a bit out of the blue, which is
why I found this paper when searching for 3kT.....
-:-

Stowe has the right ideas and insights, but unfortunately he had to do
without "peer review" nor "group think", which does show itself in
this paper. There are these gaps, like where the heck did he get that
3kT formula? and others like it, but at the end of the day it's the
(fundamental) ideas that matter most, math and references can (and
will eventually) be corrected.

Often, his older work gives clues which help working things out.
Collected quite a bit here:

http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Reference_Material/Paul_Stowe/

and here:

http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index.php/Main/StoweCollectedPosts

And I re-published a few articles on my site and added some
notes/references, etc:

http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index.php/Main/StowePersonalEMail
http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index.php/Main/StoweFoundationUnificationPhysics
http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index.php/Main/StoweNatureOfCharge
http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index.php/Main/StoweCauseGravityEmQm

It can be helpful to update posts like these by replacing the ascii
math with latex math, which is rather easy to do with my wiki site.
I've just changed the site-wide edit password (see attached picture),
so should anyone feel like helping a hand with that, you're most
welcome. I've done some of this and in a/o the section "Stowe's aether
model" on this page one can see how this improves readability and by
clicking "edit" and typing the attached magic word, one can see how
it's done:

http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index.php/Main/OnSpaceTimeAndTheFabricOfNatureCharge

I think the wiki can be very useful as a tool to facilitate a "group
thinking" process, but it would be up to you guys to fill that in,
together.

If I'm the only one using the wiki, there's not going to be much of a
group effort on there......

> Arend: Thank you! You are doing a great job with this discussion forum
about Maxwells equations and especially the discussion about the aether,
vortices and gravity.
>

Thanks a lot, much appreciated!

Best regards,

Arend.
_______________________________________________
Physics mailing list
Physics at tuks.nl
http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20200429/a30eccf2/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5757 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20200429/a30eccf2/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 84189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20200429/a30eccf2/attachment-0004.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 78804 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20200429/a30eccf2/attachment-0005.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CON-FUSING OK GRAVITATION FEBRUARY 0202 2020.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 10126128 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20200429/a30eccf2/attachment-0001.pdf>