[Physics] Physics Digest, Vol 27, Issue 1
Tom Hollings
carmam at tiscali.co.uk
Sat May 2 13:25:28 CEST 2020
Carl, I like your thinking there. A couple of thoughts spring to mind. Why does the borehole have to be that deep and vertical - and you stressed vertical. Would a deep cave or cavern not do? If the pendulum is predicted to move by 3.38 mm, why use mirrors etc, when direct/camera visual observation would show that movement?
All the best,
Tom Hollings.
> On 01 May 2020 at 16:01 cj at mb-soft.com wrote:
>
>
> Your group makes some assumptions which most of us theoretical Physicists
> would avoid. A few years ago, I described a fairly simple experiment that
> would confirm/deny that gravitation travels faster/slower.
>
> I had described a kilometer deep (extremely vertical) borehole, possibly
> near the Equator. No one seems to have ever thought about what seems
> obvious to me.
>
> Hang a slim pendulum inside it, one metric ton. And include several
> 45-angle mirrors to the sides of the pendulum bob. Use conventional laser
> interferometers to precisely monitor the exact position of the bob in the
> borehole.
>
> Newton had pointed out that Gravitation is a Vector quantity. At the moment
> of moonrise at that location, the gravitational attraction of the Moon is
> exactly horizontAl (through the Earth) and the Moon causes the pendulum to
> be attracted, toward the East, with a force of 0.03317902 newton, which
> pulls the bob horizontally toward the East by about 3.38561456 millimeters.
> Roughly 12.5 hours later, it is moonset, and the Moon's gravitation pulls
> the pendulum westward roughlly the same distance. The laser inteerferometry
> and mirrors is accurate enough to monitor that gravitational attraction of
> the Moon, every minute, every hour, and every day, where massive data can be
> collected.
>
> Data analysis can determine whether the gravitational attraction operates at
> the speed of light or whatever other speed. It would certainly make clear
> if the velocity of gravitation changes by a factor of 1.5.
>
> Eveen better data should be available if both the Moon and Sun gravitational
> Vector effects are monitored. For example, it may be possible to monitor if
> gravitation due to the Sun gets here sooner or later when we are at
> Perihelion or Aphelion (a fraction of a second)
>
> IF there are (vector) gravitational waves from distant massive bodies, this
> equipment should be accurate enough to monitor the timing as the Earth
> rotates every day. (I have my personal doubts about whether that could be
> measurred, as I see the math showing that such gravitational waves seem to
> be based on wavelengths of around 3 billion light years, and therefore
> probably beyond our ability to measure.
>
> http://mb-soft.com/public4/gravmoon.html
>
> Carl Johnson
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Physics mailing list
> Physics at tuks.nl
> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
More information about the Physics
mailing list