[Physics] Cubic Atomic Model + Theory

[Soretna]

I disagree, we do not have any actual evidence of quarks or the validity of
the SM whatsoever at this point.


On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 7:25 AM Ilja Schmelzer <ilja.schmelzer at gmail.com>
wrote:

> 2020-05-03 2:02 GMT+06:30, Soretna <illumination00 at gmail.com>:
> > I recently stumbled upon a fresh new perspective by Franklin Hu (always
> > love to find such unique perspectives) that I thought I should share for
> > review and consideration:
> > http://franklinhu.com/theory.html
>
> A rough look at this reveals:
>
> I see something about protons, electrons, and neutrons, but nothing
> about quarks, three generations of them as well as of leptons.  So, it
> looks like the SM as a whole is not covered.
>
> So, not worth to be considered.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Physics mailing list
> Physics at tuks.nl
> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20200503/40043042/attachment.html>