[Physics] Cubic Atomic Model + Theory

[Soretna]

Since this topic appears to be taboo at some level, I believe a history
lesson is essential to address fundamental problem that currently plagues
our study and even beliefs. I think a well researched/documented approach
is best to eliminate the concern of bias and to this end I must highly
recommend that anyone on this list pick up the following book for
*historical context* of where physics went wrong ~130 years ago and has yet
still not been able to recover:
https://www.amazon.com/Dynamic-Ether-Cosmic-Space-Correcting/dp/0997405716
(there
is no affiliate link there, so no fear in clicking)

Note you may ignore the non-historical information, if you wish, as I
personally did not find much value in those parts, BUT the treatment of
the historical information in this compendium contains impeccable research
that I think anyone here will very much appreciate.



On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 12:46 PM Soretna <illumination00 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Perhaps I should have gone a step further in my last hasty reply: if the
> Michelson–Morley experiment was (and various other subsequent experiments
> were) not null, then would that invalidate the SM and by extension quarks?
>
>
> On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 12:15 PM Soretna <illumination00 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I disagree, we do not have any actual evidence of quarks or the validity
>> of the SM whatsoever at this point.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 7:25 AM Ilja Schmelzer <ilja.schmelzer at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 2020-05-03 2:02 GMT+06:30, Soretna <illumination00 at gmail.com>:
>>> > I recently stumbled upon a fresh new perspective by Franklin Hu (always
>>> > love to find such unique perspectives) that I thought I should share
>>> for
>>> > review and consideration:
>>> > http://franklinhu.com/theory.html
>>>
>>> A rough look at this reveals:
>>>
>>> I see something about protons, electrons, and neutrons, but nothing
>>> about quarks, three generations of them as well as of leptons.  So, it
>>> looks like the SM as a whole is not covered.
>>>
>>> So, not worth to be considered.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Physics mailing list
>>> Physics at tuks.nl
>>> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20200505/ac43c133/attachment.html>