[Physics] Cubic Atomic Model + Theory

[Tom Hollings]

Mike, you are doing what all people do when they cannot answer the question. I am not talking about meons, loops etc, I am talking about a solid, tangible rocket. OK, a rocket (in the present day) could not carry enough fuel to accelerate to light speed and above, so that is why this is a thought experiment.
The question is : -  Please tell me using SRT why the rocket cannot exceed light speed. Einstein stated that it could not, using SRT to "prove" it. So you must use SRT to prove that I am wrong.
Tom.


> On 09 May 2020 at 14:02 mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk wrote:
> 
> 
> Tom
> 
> I thought I did answer your question. The mass and charge forces between 
> meons in the two opposite loops of a photon are along their direction of 
> travel. The size of each is
> 
> MM
> 
> 
> 
> On 2020-05-09 12:14, Tom Hollings wrote:
> > Mike, regarding your answer to Arend. The real world can always be
> > expressed by maths, but maths does not always express the real world.
> > The maths may work out correctly, but have no correspondence in
> > reality. Instead of doing the maths and then saying "this is possible,
> > let's look for it", look for something (or find it by accident), and
> > then do the maths to explain it. That sentence is simplified of
> > course.
> > Back to my posting. Instead of answering using SRT as I asked (and GRT
> > if you think it is needed), you started talking about photons and
> > meons and loops chasing each other. Just answer the question, or tell
> > me where I am wrong. As I said in my previous post, yes, friction will
> > act on a body, but when that body carries a source of power ie a
> > reaction motor, that friction can be overcome. You will find reference
> > to particles in space here : -
> > http://problemswithrelativity.com/#constancy
> > Tom.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> On 08 May 2020 at 15:17 mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Tom,
> >> 
> >> You noticed my attempt to simplify!! What I didn't mention in my
> >> explanation was that, in a photon, as well as each meon in the loop
> >> chasing the next one to it, it also chases its opposite number in the
> >> other loop. For a single loop, there is only the one set of net 
> >> circular
> >> forces from one meon to the next. It is the action of each meon in one
> >> loop chasing its opposite in the other loop that drives the total
> >> two-loop photon up to the maximum speed it can manage in the local
> >> environment against the friction produced by the viscosity of that 
> >> local
> >> environment. Where the photon is in 'empty' space, there is still the
> >> background to travel through, so it loses energy as it moves, a red
> >> shift. When near a star, there is more viscosity so it has to work
> >> harder against more friction and its maximum speed will still be c, 
> >> but
> >> the numerical value may be near zero - especially when trying to 
> >> escape
> >> from a black hole.
> >> 
> >> Apologies for eliding over that...
> >> 
> >> Cheers
> >> Mike
>