[Physics] Cubic Atomic Model + Theory

[mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk]

Tom,

Please see the attached paper which includes within it the proof that no 
matter how many velocities you add to an object, it will never exceed c 
(in normal space). Part of it includes the main SRT equation which is 
simply the rejigging of  x^2 + Y^2 = Z^2 in two dimensions. So it goes 
beyond SRT.

Cheers
Mike

ps Please ignore the Fermat section. I have a better paper on that, 
although that also subsequently did not exclude some values of N, so it 
is work in progress.



On 2020-05-09 16:35, Tom Hollings wrote:
> Mike, you are doing what all people do when they cannot answer the
> question. I am not talking about meons, loops etc, I am talking about
> a solid, tangible rocket. OK, a rocket (in the present day) could not
> carry enough fuel to accelerate to light speed and above, so that is
> why this is a thought experiment.
> The question is : -  Please tell me using SRT why the rocket cannot
> exceed light speed. Einstein stated that it could not, using SRT to
> "prove" it. So you must use SRT to prove that I am wrong.
> Tom.
> 
> 
>> On 09 May 2020 at 14:02 mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Tom
>> 
>> I thought I did answer your question. The mass and charge forces 
>> between
>> meons in the two opposite loops of a photon are along their direction 
>> of
>> travel. The size of each is
>> 
>> MM
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 2020-05-09 12:14, Tom Hollings wrote:
>> > Mike, regarding your answer to Arend. The real world can always be
>> > expressed by maths, but maths does not always express the real world.
>> > The maths may work out correctly, but have no correspondence in
>> > reality. Instead of doing the maths and then saying "this is possible,
>> > let's look for it", look for something (or find it by accident), and
>> > then do the maths to explain it. That sentence is simplified of
>> > course.
>> > Back to my posting. Instead of answering using SRT as I asked (and GRT
>> > if you think it is needed), you started talking about photons and
>> > meons and loops chasing each other. Just answer the question, or tell
>> > me where I am wrong. As I said in my previous post, yes, friction will
>> > act on a body, but when that body carries a source of power ie a
>> > reaction motor, that friction can be overcome. You will find reference
>> > to particles in space here : -
>> > http://problemswithrelativity.com/#constancy
>> > Tom.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> On 08 May 2020 at 15:17 mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Tom,
>> >>
>> >> You noticed my attempt to simplify!! What I didn't mention in my
>> >> explanation was that, in a photon, as well as each meon in the loop
>> >> chasing the next one to it, it also chases its opposite number in the
>> >> other loop. For a single loop, there is only the one set of net
>> >> circular
>> >> forces from one meon to the next. It is the action of each meon in one
>> >> loop chasing its opposite in the other loop that drives the total
>> >> two-loop photon up to the maximum speed it can manage in the local
>> >> environment against the friction produced by the viscosity of that
>> >> local
>> >> environment. Where the photon is in 'empty' space, there is still the
>> >> background to travel through, so it loses energy as it moves, a red
>> >> shift. When near a star, there is more viscosity so it has to work
>> >> harder against more friction and its maximum speed will still be c,
>> >> but
>> >> the numerical value may be near zero - especially when trying to
>> >> escape
>> >> from a black hole.
>> >>
>> >> Apologies for eliding over that...
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >> Mike
>> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Relativistic Addition of n Velocities M Lawrence .pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 417071 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20200509/83649887/attachment.pdf>