[Physics] Some 25 *specific* EM frequencies harmful for living organisms?

[Arend Lammertink]

Turns out the guy wrote a "Confidential Report on TETRA Strictly for
the Police Federation of England and Wales", which can be found here:

http://www.tetrawatch.net/tetra/trower.php

More info here:

http://geopathology-za.wikidot.com/barrie-trower
https://www.facebook.com/BarrieTrower

Regards,

Arend.


On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Arend Lammertink <lamare at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is it true that some 25 or so *specific* EM frequencies should be
> considered harmful for living organisms and should therefore be
> avoided as much as possible?
>
>
>
> I'm currently about 5 minutes in in this interesting interview with
> Mr. Barrie Trower:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09mpvscHiKI
>
> So far, it seems the guy knows what he is talking about and appears to
> have the qualifications he would need:
>
> -:-
> Mr. Barrie Trower takes no money or gifts for his interviews.
> Sponsored by Kenneth Rhoades of Michigan, two victims of this domestic
> terrorism, Debra Poulsen and Rose Gapinski (both from Wisconsin),
> traveled to England from the U.S. to speak with him directly. He
> invited us into his home and we had a casual, informative and, at
> times, shocking conversation. One thing we know for sure, we are not
> alone. This is happening to nearly everyone in the U.S. and around the
> world. Most are unaware, and to some it feels like torture. I am not
> asking you to be the judge. There is nothing to judge. This is fact.
>
> Barrie Trower states, "In the 1960s I trained at the Government
> Microwave Warfare Establishment. I worked with the Underwater Bomb
> disposal unit which used microwaves within its unit. In the 1970s one
> of my tasks over an eleven year period was to de-brief spies involved
> in microwave warfare. The location and process that I used I cannot go
> into as it is still considered secret. I have two Degrees, and a
> Diploma and in my retirement I now teach Advanced Level Physics, some
> Mathematics and some Human Physiology at South Dartmoor College. In
> September 2001 I was commissioned by the Police Federation to write
> 'The Tetra Report'."
>
> Though some consider microwave and EMF weapons the stuff of science
> fiction, Maj. Doug Rokke, Ph.D., the former head of the US Army's
> depleted uranium cleanup project after Gulf War I, says these weapons
> are very real, and commonly used in military circles. He described to
> me how he personally used such weapons on a regular basis while
> training with Special Forces at US Army facilities: "We had them
> van-mounted, truck-mounted, plane-mounted, and hand-carried. We would
> go around zapping each other for fun. This was during exercises, or
> sometimes just as a practical joke." Rokke assured me that, based on
> his firsthand knowledge of US military mind-set and capabilities, 9/11
> truth activists have undoubtedly been targeted by exotic non-lethal
> (and lethal) weapons.
>
> Mike Ruppert, the original leader of the 9/11 truth movement, writes
> that his office was attacked by microwave and/or EMF weapons after he
> began publishing critiques of the official story of 9/11. The attacks
> may have contributed to Ruppert's poor health and distraught frame of
> mind, which led him to quit the 9/11 truth movement and temporarily
> flee the USA in 2006.
>
> Another early 9/11 truth advocate, publisher Byron Belitsos, told me
> that he and many other 9/11 truth organizers in California were
> targeted by EMF or microwave weapons during the first years after
> 9/11. Belitsos says the weapons were wielded by men in plain white
> vans that would park in front of the victim's house, and that victims
> suffered immediate and sometimes extreme health effects including
> headaches, ringing in the ears, nausea, vomiting, severe depression,
> dizziness, and loss of consciousness.
>
> Richard Gage, the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth,
> may have been attacked by the type of EMF or microwave weapon
> described by Ruppert and Belitsos. In the summer of 2009, in
> Washington, DC, Gage suddenly suffered vertigo and hearing loss.
> Activist colleagues who were present suspect some kind of covert
> attack. Today, Gage still suffers from the after-effects: partial loss
> of hearing in one ear.
> -:-
>
>
> So far, he said he had a list of about 25 *specific* frequencies,
> which can cause certain effects on the human body. Now _that_ is an
> interesting notion, because if the harmful frequencies are *specific*,
> we can avoid these frequencies, while continue to utilizing other
> frequencies which are not harmful.
>
> He also says EE's have no idea what they are transmitting as EM
> radiation, but I know from personal experience that devices with a
> "CE" mark *should* be screened for EM radiation. I've personally had
> such a screening done at "Kema" for a product we developed at an
> employer of mine. However, "CE" mark testing is the responsibility of
> the manufacturer (my employer in my case), so it is possible other
> manufacturers release products which emit too much EM radiation.
>
> Either way, if there is such a list, I would expect frequencies known
> to affect water, such as the 21 cm line, to be amongst those on the
> list. This would probably also include the frequency microwave ovens
> work with and possibly the 435 MHz Maurice asked about:
>
> http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/2016-December/000323.html
>
>
> As said, I listened only 5 minutes so far, so I can't vow for what's
> in the interview, but perhaps the idea that specific frequencies,
> probably related to water and hydrogen, *could* be harmful for living
> organisms is perhaps worth considering and discussing.
>
> So, the question is:
>
> Is it true that some 25 or so *specific* EM frequencies should be
> considered harmful for living organisms and should therefore be
> avoided as much as possible?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Arend Lammertink, MScEE,
> Goor, The Netherlands.
> W: http://www.tuks.nl
> T: +316 5425 6426