[Physics] Arguments for or against the variable time (of Relativity)

[Hans van Leunen]

Mr Serret,
In that case you must research the foundation of physical reality and see how proper time and spatial locations emerge from that foundation.
Personally I took the orthomodular lattice that in 1936 was discovered by Garret Birkhoff and John von Neumann as the foundation of physical reality.
The mathematician John Baez has explained the corollary of that choice in his paper: “Division algebras and quantum theory” ;. http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.5690 .
My paper "The Hilbert Book Test Model" ; http://vixra.org/abs/1603.0021 explores the results of these scientists. "Thou Shalt Construct in a Modular Way" ; http://vixra.org/abs/1607.0146  offers a shorter introduction.
Sincerely yours,
Hans
----Origineel Bericht----
Van : o.serret at free.fr
Datum : 22/10/2016 13:40
Aan : physics at tuks.nl
Onderwerp : [Physics] Arguments for or against the variable time (of Relativity)
 
  
   > So what is it that you want to discuss, the concept of time or the results of Lorentz transforms?
  
  
    
  
  
   I would like to discuss of the MEASURE of the proper time (or the PROOF of the proper time existence)
  
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20161022/a4d9b9ec/attachment.html>