[Physics] Arguments for or against the variable time (of Relativity)

[Doug Marett]

No, I think that experimentation is the most important part of theory
development; math should be applied more as an adjunct to explain observed
facts, since math has the unfortunate property of allowing an individual to
conjure up whatever universe they please, whether we live in it or not!
That is why there are thousands of theories and only one reality!!

On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Hans van Leunen <jleunen1941 at kpnmail.nl>
wrote:

> If you do not comprehend sufficiently of essential parts of mathematics,
> then it is impossible to understand and decide on the fundamentals of
> physical reality.
> Hans
>
> ----Origineel Bericht----
> Van : 1948emery6 at gmail.com
> Datum : 22/10/2016 13:49
> Aan : physics at tuks.nl
> Onderwerp : Re: [Physics] Arguments for or against the variable time (of
> Relativity)
>
>
> FOR THE VAST MAJORITY OF CREATION  -  *LINEAL* TIME DOES NOT EXIST.   END
> OF DISCUSSION  SNICKER   -  EVEN EINSTEIN FIGURED THAT OUT
>
> https://www.academia.edu/20275104/THE_ILLUSION_OF_TIME
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 12:40 PM, O. Serret <o.serret at free.fr> wrote:
>
>> > So what is it that you want to discuss, the concept of time or the
>> results of Lorentz transforms?
>>
>> I would like to discuss of the MEASURE of the proper time (or the PROOF
>> of the proper time existence)
>>
>> ______________________________ _________________
>> Physics mailing list
>> Physics at tuks.nl
>> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/ mailman/listinfo/physics
>> <http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Physics mailing list
> Physics at tuks.nl
> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20161022/5c636e34/attachment.html>