[Physics] new paper "One way speed of light test - is it possible?"

[Doug Marett]

Hi Hans,

   Herbert Ives and Ron Hatch are Lorentzians, so following their lead the
model considered assumes an immobile medium where light propagates as a
transverse wave at C in the medium.

Doug

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Hans van Leunen <jleunen1941 at kpnmail.nl>
wrote:

> In theoretical models that apply quaternionic Hilbert spaces the speed of
> information transfer follows from solutions of homogeneous quaternionic
> second order partial differential equations. There the speed of information
> transfer in "free space" equals 1.
> Experimenters must first define what light is or more specifically what
> photons are.
> See https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Hilbert_Book_Model_
> Project/Information_Messengers
> Greathings,
> Hans
>
> ----Origineel Bericht----
> Van : dm88dm at gmail.com
> Datum : 19/07/2017 20:05
> Aan : physics at tuks.nl
> Onderwerp : [Physics] new paper "One way speed of light test - is it
> possible?"
>
>
> Just uploaded a new paper on the question of whether it is possible to
> measure the one-way speed of light. The paper is at
> http://conspiracyoflight.com/pdf/Oneway1.pdf
>
> For a bit of background, I was considering performing a one-way EM
> propagation test over about 30 Km using GPS disciplined clocks at either
> end to measure the propagation time. From the lit, various authors have
> reported detecting our rotational velocity this way, or even a sidereal
> velocity (for example Torr and Kolen, using coaxial cable and rubidium
> clocks). I decided to work through it in an Excel file to figure out what
> the result should be. My thinking is based on the papers about clock
> synchronization published by Herbert Ives and Ron Hatch. So this paper is
> really an informal examination of what one might expect, with lots of
> pictures and diagrams. I am sure it isn't perfect so if there are any
> errors I apologize in advance, this paper is more exploratory than anything
> else.
>
> sincerely,
>
> Doug
>
> www.conspiracyoflight.com
>
> P.S. - this exercise also seemed to uncover some bizarre alignments
> between the cosmic microwave background radiation anisotropy and the
> ecliptic and the solar apex motion of the solar system, which has me a
> little spooked. I am going to investigate this further, but these
> alignments almost suggest that the CMBr anisotropy may be due to our local
> motion around the sun or our sun's motion around the galaxy.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Physics mailing list
> Physics at tuks.nl
> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20170719/dd3be4ab/attachment.html>