[Physics] new paper "One way speed of light test - is it possible?"

[Doug Marett]

Impending disaster in Cosmology!

    Just following on from my post last week, where I talked about issues
with the CMBr aligning with our local motion through space. I just
discovered that a number of researchers have been using new independent
methods to verify our kinetic motion with respect to the "universe" in
light of the suspicious CMBr data. What they have uncovered is that our
apparent motion based on things like galactic aberration, is now measured
to be  4-5X higher than that predicted by the CMBr - in the 1350 to 1730
km/s range! The kinetic dipole found using these new methods is also skewed
about 25-30 degrees away from the original CMBr dipole direction. This huge
velocity discrepancy is going to cause some serious problems with the Big
Bang theory and everything they have attributed to the CMBr, because now it
is looking more and more like the CMBr is mostly local radio signal
contamination. I am going to be creating a youTube video about this soon,
but for anyone wanting more info, here are some of the latest papers:The
Colin paper was very interesting. - Doug


Colin 2017  https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.09376

Singal 2015 https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.6260

Singal 2014 https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.4796

Singal 2015 https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.4134

Huterer, 2012 https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.6476

Huterer 2015
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~huterer/Papers/kinematic_dipole_Yoon.pdf

Rubart 2013 https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2013/07/aa21215-13.pdf

Tiwari 2013 https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.1947

https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.3970
Tiwari 2017 https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.06719

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Doug Marett <dm88dm at gmail.com> wrote:

> Just uploaded a new paper on the question of whether it is possible to
> measure the one-way speed of light. The paper is at
> http://conspiracyoflight.com/pdf/Oneway1.pdf
>
> For a bit of background, I was considering performing a one-way EM
> propagation test over about 30 Km using GPS disciplined clocks at either
> end to measure the propagation time. From the lit, various authors have
> reported detecting our rotational velocity this way, or even a sidereal
> velocity (for example Torr and Kolen, using coaxial cable and rubidium
> clocks). I decided to work through it in an Excel file to figure out what
> the result should be. My thinking is based on the papers about clock
> synchronization published by Herbert Ives and Ron Hatch. So this paper is
> really an informal examination of what one might expect, with lots of
> pictures and diagrams. I am sure it isn't perfect so if there are any
> errors I apologize in advance, this paper is more exploratory than anything
> else.
>
> sincerely,
>
> Doug
>
> www.conspiracyoflight.com
>
> P.S. - this exercise also seemed to uncover some bizarre alignments
> between the cosmic microwave background radiation anisotropy and the
> ecliptic and the solar apex motion of the solar system, which has me a
> little spooked. I am going to investigate this further, but these
> alignments almost suggest that the CMBr anisotropy may be due to our local
> motion around the sun or our sun's motion around the galaxy.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20170723/17cfe46c/attachment.html>