[Physics] Physics Digest, Vol 14, Issue 9

[carmam at tiscali.co.uk]

Unfortunately Carl, I would grow old and grey before I could get even a tenth of the way into the maths involved! Here is an article which is worth a read :- http://www.alternativephysics.org/book/MercuryPerihelion.htm .
I can follow the logic - but the maths, no.

Tom.




----Original Message----

From: cj at mb-soft.com

Date: 23/04/2018 21:33 

To: <physics at tuks.nl>

Subj: Re: [Physics] Physics Digest, Vol 14, Issue 9







Guys,
 
I have something entirely different to ask you 
about.  Do you like to do difficult math?
 
"The public" TOTALLY accepts that Einstein's 
General Relatvity has an "airtight" explanation of the Precession of Mercury's 
perihelion.  Really strict Theoretical Physicists do NOT believe 
that.  (including me)  
 
It actually is NOT accurate in calculating 
it.  The MEASURED precession is DIFFERENT than what Einstein's math shows, 
by about one percent,  To a strict Theoretical Physicist, that is 
OUTRAGEOUSLY WRONG.
 
For many years, I have studied that matter, and I 
think I have found a "far more precisely correct" explanation.
 
Most Physicists, including Einstein do 
TWO-DIMENSIONAL math.  Euler expanded the math to THREE 
DIMENSIONS.
 
When I have done the math (Euler) regarding 
Jupiter's precessional on Mercury, I think I have found math results that are 
twenty times more accurate than Einstein's GR.  As per Euler, the main 
effect is due to a Z-axis gravitational effect in the Euler equations.  It 
is much like the third dimensional effect in gyroscopic Euler math where an 
entirely NEW effect appears, in a third dimension, where the Precession 
arises.  It is a pure gravitational effect, and it is amazingly accurate 
for Mercury's perihelion, and (nearly) entirely due to Jupiter.
 
I am hoping that you might be interested in 
confirming my Euler math.
 
Carl Johnson
_______________________________________________
Physics mailing list
Physics at tuks.nl
http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20180424/879bfa24/attachment.html>