[Physics] EM waves

[Tufail Abbas]

So *What does Nothing mean?. *Or in other words *What does Universe without
matter would mean*?:

Here is my answer

Universe without matter means perfect isotropy, both on small as well as
large. The Universe with matter as we reckon is anisotropic and
inhomogeneous at smaller scale but isotropic and homogeneous at large
scale.

Current mass density of Universe is calculated approximately 6 protons per
cubic. However that does not mean that every Cubic meter will contain 6
proton/neutron.

Imagine a situation where mass is distributed to every cubic meter each
containing 6 proton/neutron in an uniformly expanding Universe.[
<https://www.quora.com/profile/Tufail-Abbas-1#xOnvi>

In such a Universe, you will not be able to distinguish one direction from
other direction. Neither it will be possible to to differentiate between
two objects. Hence the existence of matter would collapse.

You should appreciate that perfect isotropy and homogeneity does not mean
the absence of information but impossibility to differentiate one piece of
information from other.

*In other words, it is the variations and the possibility to differentiate
between kinds of matter, that brings the matter into existence.*


On 22 March 2018 at 10:50, Hans van Leunen <jleunen1941 at kpnmail.nl> wrote:

> Which mechanism generates gravitons? All massive objects in the universe
> are recurrently regenerated. See "Generating mass from nothing"
> http://vixra.org/abs/1803.0388
>
> ----Origineel Bericht----
> Van : tufail.abbas at gmail.com
> Datum : 22/03/2018 06:01
> Aan : physics at tuks.nl
> Onderwerp : Re: [Physics] EM waves
>
> Dear Randy,
>
> Further to the below email, we would like to inform that we (Tufail Abbas
> & Ruud Loeffen) have written a paper titled "Wave Function of the Solar
> System" which is attached. In this paper a possible wave function has been
> proposed, though it may require modifications, as per actual future
> findings. We believe that such a wave-function, would embed an LC circuits
> within it.
>
> In your paper about gravitons( http://labs.plantbio.cornell.e
> *du/wayne/pdfs/gravitons.pdf*
> <http://labs.plantbio.cornell.edu/wayne/pdfs/gravitons.pdf>* ) you
> have guessed that a wavelength of 3X10^6 m could be the possible wavelength
> of gravitons. We have calculated an analogous Compton wavelength of 2.26 X
> 10^8 of solar system as you can see in Appendix C. And you said in the
> paper that gravity could be the result of some Compton Like Scattering. *
>
>
>
>
>
> * We request your review and feedback, if there is any connection,
> Regards, Tufail Abbas *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *_______________________________________________ Physics mailing list
> Physics at tuks.nl <Physics at tuks.nl>
> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
> <http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics> *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20180322/f1673228/attachment.html>