[Physics] Situation of the calculation of alpha (the fine structure constant)

[Arend Lammertink]

Hi Jesus,

Paul Stowe defines alpha as:

http://vixra.org/pdf/1310.0237v1.pdf

alpha = 1 / ( sqrt(3) * 8 * pi^2)  = 7.321e-3  (eq. 16)


This is derived from the geometry of a vortex ring, which appears to be the
actual geometry of the electron.

Regards,

Arend.









Arend Lammertink, MScEE,
Goor, The Netherlands.
W: http://www.tuks.nl
T: +316 5425 6426

On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 9:03 PM, Jesus Sanchez <
jesus.sanchez.bilbao at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I have been trying during the last year to find an alternative way to
> arrive to the value of the constant alpha 0.00729 (unitless constant). I
> have updated the situation of the project in researchgate and I attach it
> to you for your information.
>
> Hello all,
> I will explain here all that I have tried, but regretfully with no the
> expected results. But just in case this experience can be usefull for all
> of you or the next ones to come.
> -First: mathematical approach. Forgetting about the meaning, I have looked
> for new numbers (apart from pi and the powers of two) inside the sine wave
> and the sphere (where the electron is moving). For example, I have found
> the length of the elementary sine wave in a cycle to be 7.640... (a number
> obtained with an integration and not related to pi). So I have tried to
> correlate with fine structure constant with no result. I have found a lot
> of new numbers if we project the sine wave in the sphere (the real length
> of the elctron trajectory). I have mixed all these new numbers among them,
> with pi, powers of two. Whatever you can imagine with no result.
> -Second: Physical approach. For this what I have defined is a model where
> the proton is like a lighthouse and the electron is like a seagull with a
> rotating mirror in his head. Trying to fix that it is necessary that at
> certain points both things must face each other so the photons can be sent
> and abosrbed by the electron. Let's say like a discretization of
> interactions (not alll possible, only the ones that fulfill certain
> timing/synchronization). Also, taking into account that as the electron is
> moving, the mirror rotates slower than the proton because of relativistic
> issues (even if we consider that originally rotated at the same speed), so
> the synchro has to be got via distances or angles. This would lead to
> constraints, and the fine structure constant would appear as one of them.
> Believe me I have tried. Normally I would get a promising quartic equation
> with two complex roots (disregarded in principle) a trivial value like zero
> or higher than one (higher than the speed of light) and the final root, the
> value that should be alpha=0.00729, it is normally a value betwenn 0,2 and
> 0,5 far away from alpha.
> Also, I have tried to considerate that these particles have spin 1/2 so an
> own turn is 4pi instead of 2pi, making variations in the result but
> continueing being far away from alpha.
> The nearest I have been to alpha is 1/16pi^2 (0.00633). It is logical as
> it is 1/(4pi)^2 being 4pi one own turn for an electron. And the squares are
> easy to get when there are relatvistic issues or quartic equations. And the
> rest for the fine tuning (until 0.00729) would be with the rest of the
> coefficients of whatever the equation it is.
> Sorry to give bad news but this is the situation, I will keep trying if I
> have more ideas or ways to follow. But the pace would be even slower than
> until now.
>
>
> https://www.researchgate.net/project/Calculation-of-the-
> fine-structure-constant
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Physics mailing list
> Physics at tuks.nl
> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20180329/82fd1b05/attachment.html>